ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION

PREDICTED

COVID-19 IN 2010

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

2010 Rockefeller "Lock Step" Document Coming To Life Right Now. Time To Wake Up.

The report titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development has a stated goal of creating "a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."

"A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues… An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge… An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems."

Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the New World Order (NWO) Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. 

It is also a fine example of predictive programming.

In actuality, they are blueprints written by key insiders who already know the game plan and the agenda, and have the power to make it happen.

This document expresses 4 scenarios:

1 : Lock Step -- Tighter Top Down Government Control and Growing Citizen Pushback.

2 : Hack Attack --- Unstable Shock Prone World In Which Criminals Thrive.

3 : Smart Scramble -- Economically Depressed World With Make Shift Solution To Ever Growing Problems.

4 : Clever Together -- A Highly Coordinated Global Government Where Successful Strategies For Solving All Problems Emerges.

The scenario "Lock Step", one of four included in a publication called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society.

Remove such obstacles as "individual rights" and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation states. (remember, this was written in 2010): 

"A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery."

The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. 

First and third world nations alike follow suit by "flexing their authority" and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other "airtight rules and restrictions" – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. 

"In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who "willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight." 

Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. 

It takes over a decade for people to "grow weary" of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. 

After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality.

Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many scientists, statesmen, and alternative media, have raised the alarm about coronavirus. 

Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus "rumors," and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. 

"I am not saying this is or is not true. I just find it interesting that you can not find ANY of this information online anymore. Don't you find that odd?".

Remember, this document is looking at a future scenario from its publish date of 2010, which was ten years ago. 

The Rockefeller Foundation paints a disturbing picture, a future pandemic that kills 8 million people in just 7 months. 

Looking at the present, the Coronavirus has not killed anywhere near that number. 

Most of those who died from Coronavirus had chronic health issues to begin with. 

They are the same people who would have died from the Seasonal Flu.

More in the document: "The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers."

Without Government Intervention Virus Spreads.

The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.

Translation: In the absence of an authoritarian government, the virus was able to spread.

By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation is embracing and promoting authoritarian government. 

In their scenario, they are seeking to remove the rights of the people in order to prevent the virus from spreading. 

In their mind, during a Pandemic or other similar event, the government must overturn the law and become authoritarian.

In developed countries, containment was a challenge. 

The United States’s initial policy of "strongly discouraging" citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.

In the mind of the Rockefeller Foundation, our Constitution amounts to "leniency". 

Therefore, our Constitution should have been suspended, and replaced with authoritarian government in order to contain the spread of the future virus. 

This is a clear violation of our basic God-given rights. (remember, this was written in 2010).

"However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery."

The globalist Rockefeller Foundation praises Communist China for their authoritarian actions, remember, this was a future scenario, not reality. 

However, this is exactly what happened in China! 

They were indeed the first to lock down their nation, and the rest of the world followed suit.

By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation explains Communism, which is authoritarianism protecting the people. 

Of course, this is always how globalists spin their propaganda, "it's for the good of the people".  

In reality, our freedoms are removed for the good of global government, not for the people.

From the 2010 document: "During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets." (ummmm, sound familiar?)

If it is hard for you to differentiate this future scenario from reality, you are not alone. 

Their future scenario is our reality, just look at what is happening right now.

"Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified."

Not only will these authoritarian controls remain according to the Rockefeller Foundation, but they will intensify. 

That means our freedom and rights will continue to be removed, not just in the United States, but globally. 

Have you heard of "The Great Reset"?

"In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

Just a snippet of info about the Rockefellers:

The Rockefeller family has been in the forefront of eugenics-the science of population control, since 1902.  

In 1952, David Rockefeller’s eldest brother John established the Population Council. 

In the subsequent decades, the eugenics program developed, tested, and implemented various bio-warfare tools, as a means of controlling population growth. 

Since then, efforts at creating the necessary infrastructure, research bodies, lab testing and experimentations, have proceeded till the present day. 

By the end of 1945, the dominant force in America was the 5 Rockefeller brothers. 

Their mandate was to take control of the entire globe, and to eliminate any rivals on its quest for global dominance.

Even Adolf Hitler’s extermination policies against Jews and other minorities, was funded by the Rockefeller family.

Starting in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the first fruits of their research yielded the AIDS virus, which devastated many Third World nations. 

This was followed by more exotic viruses such as SARS, MERS 2000, Ebola, the Avian flu, etc.