CDC 

COVID DOCUMENT

DISCUSSED RELOCATING

"HIGH RISK"

INDIVIDUALS TO "CAMPS"

By

Søren Nielsen

The CDC published a COVID-19 planning document that suggested relocating "high-risk individuals" to "green zones" or "camps" in order to keep them away from the rest of the population.

The document is called "Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings" and was originally published on the CDC’s official website on July 26, 2020.

The purpose of the strategy document is "to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease ("high-risk") and the general population ("low-risk")."

According to the CDC, in order to achieve this, High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or "green zones" established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. 

They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

The shielding approach would take "high-risk" individuals, meaning older people or people with underlying health conditions, and set about "physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population."

These high-risk individuals would be relocated to "camps," meaning "shelters such as schools, community buildings" where as many as 50 individuals would be held in each "green zone" where "no movement into or outside the green zone" would be allowed.

The document takes into account considerations on hosuing "different ethnicities, socio-cultural groups, or religions" within such "green zones".

"Isolation/separation from family members, loss of freedom and personal interactions may require additional psychosocial support structures/systems," states the document, noting that those who are isolated may face "stigmatization."

The summary at the end of the document warns that "compliance" may be an issue when isolating people in such a manner because while "the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings."

Commentator Candace Owens didn’t hold back when expressing her concerns about the implications of the document.

"Holy shit. The CDC actually put together a document to discuss putting high risk people into camps to "shield" low risk people from them," she tweeted.

"No — this is not a joke, and yes, every single person who has made a reference to 1930’s Germany is vindicated."

MASSIVE 

COVID SPIKE DESPITE 

OVER 90% OF POPULATION VACCINATED

By

Sørren Nielsen

2021

Stats coming out of several countries show vaccinated people are spreading Covid-19, as evidence mounts the vaccine is actually causing viral variants and infections as experts predicted.

In Gibraltar, a peninsula in Spain, almost 99% of the population is fully vaccinated – that’s according to info provided by Google.

By June 1, over 99% of Gibraltar's population was fully vaccinated.

Since that time, new COVID cases per day have increased more than 2500%.

Despite the high vaccination rate, Covid cases appear to be on the rise, increasing by 2,500 percent per day.

The data is consistent with stats seen in Israel which show the delta variant running rampant despite a majority of the population being fully vaccinated.

On Tuesday, it was reported by Israeli media that people who were already infected with Covid were 7 times less likely to be reinfected than those who were vaccinated, speaking to the power of natural immunity.

Likewise, in Iceland, an island where nearly the entire adult population is vaccinated, Covid cases are similarly on the rise.

"The country is a vaccinators’ paradise," reported journalist Alex Berensen. "90% of people 40-70 and 98% (!) of those over 70 are fully vaccinated."

On Tuesday, Iceland’s chief epidemiologist even suggested some COVID-19 lockdown restrictions could remain in place for up to 15 years.

Also on Thursday, Singapore emerged as yet another country where the vaccinated appear to be spreading Covid, with the government revealing that about three-quarters of new Covid-19 infections stemmed from vaccinated people.

Meanwhile, in Sweden, where the vaccination rate is hovering at a low 39 percent and the government is not enforcing face masks, there have been zero Covid deaths.

The evidence suggests the vaccine is actually spreading disease in more countries than just the United States.

With stats like these, it’s easy to see why so many would be hesitant, or outright refuse to take the experimental jab.

 Viral-like Inclusions in COVID-19

Negative Renal Biopsies 

by 

Electron Microscopy

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

Since the discovery of the causative agent for the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–like pneumonia syndrome pandemic that started in China in 2019, a coronavirus named SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), electron microscopy images have populated the medical literature and media outlets alike displaying the characteristic 60–140 nm round particles surrounded by a "corona" of 9–12 nm distinctive spikes. 

Although many of these images were obtained after "in vitro" infection of cultured cells with SARS-CoV-2 and are thus likely a true representation of viral particles, we have observed morphologically indistinguishable inclusions within podocytes and tubular epithelial cells both in patients negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as in renal biopsies from the pre–COVID-19 era. 

Although direct infection of the kidney is theoretically possible, given the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (the receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 to gain access to cells) within proximal tubular epithelium and podocytes, the virus has not been detected by real-time RT-PCR in urine samples from patients with COVID-19. 

Additionally, for the virus to have access to kidney parenchyma, viremia should occur, and this has only been detected in a minority of patients.

We would, therefore, like to issue a note of caution for inferring viral tissue infection by morphology alone using electron microscopy images from tissues obtained from biopsies or autopsy material in patients with COVID-19. 

Moreover, caution should be used when interpreting immunohistochemical results, especially within proximal tubules, which are prone to nonspecific staining by a variety of antibodies due to their intense reabsorptive capacity. 

Additionally, more specific techniques such as immunoelectron microscopy using specific viral antigens, or in situ hybridization for viral RNA, are likely necessary to undoubtedly confirm tissue infection in these cases.

Indeed, in two recent reports of collapsing glomerulopathy in patients with COVID-19, viral RNA was not detected in the kidney by in situ hybridization. 

Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis using a SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein antibody previously shown to have positive staining in the kidney of patients with COVID-19 showed nonspecific positive staining in the renal parenchyma of all kidneys in our laboratory.

We postulated that endogenous mimickers could be present that are morphologically indistinguishable from SARS-CoV-2 virions ultrastructurally. 

To confirm this, we reviewed cases under the electron microscope, looking for round cytoplasmic inclusions in podocytes, tubular epithelial cells, or endothelial cells, each with an individual diameter between 60 and 140 nm, present either in isolation or in groups. 

Approval for this study was obtained by the Solutions Institutional Review Board, and the ethical principles highlighted by the Declaration of Helsinki were followed. 

To optimize ultrastructural morphology, we excluded cases that were rapidly processed and only reviewed cases for which the renal biopsy tissue underwent routine processing (this included overnight polymerization and standard grid staining). 

Five cases were from the pre–COVID-19 era and ten cases were recent (biopsy dates from February to April 2020). 

Eight cases were allografts and six were native kidney biopsies. Case details can be found in Table 1. 

Viral-like inclusions, consisting both of single vesicles with diameters between 50 and 139 nm, as well as packed groups within larger vesicles, were found in all 15 cases, either in podocytes, tubular epithelium, or vascular endothelial cells (Figure 1).

Viral-like particles in non-COVID19 patients biopsies. 

Electron microscopy images of viral-like particles within podocytes in a case of thrombotic microangiopathy in a (A) native kidney biopsy specimen and (B) acute cellular rejection in an allograft. 

Note the presence in both cases of single vesicles with an electron-dense rim likely representing endocytic coated vesicles, as well as larger multivesicular bodies (arrows), which could be confounded with vesicle packets containing virions. 

Inset in (A): the individual small coated pits in the exterior of the vesicle bear resemblance to a viral corona. 

(C) Similar intracytoplasmic vesicles within tubules in an allograft with changes suspicious for acute cellular rejection.

Additionally, we have performed in situ hybridization for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in eight biopsies from patients with active COVID-19 who had evidence of kidney disease and were unable to detect virus RNA in renal tissue, despite adequate positive controls. 

This appears to be in contrast with a recent study that showed SARS-CoV-2 RNA could be detected by RT-PCR within renal tissue in 13 of 22 autopsied kidneys; however, it should be noted that the viral RNA levels detected were quite low (close to the lowest limit of detection of one copy per cell), and could potentially represent viral RNA within renal blood vessels.

Microdissection by renal compartment was done in only six cases, and of those only three showed positive viral RNA within the glomerular compartment, which again could still potentially be secondary to viral particles in the blood. 

Spatially resolved in situ hybridization in one example provided shows positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA within tubular epithelium and glomeruli, but it is not clear in how many cases this was present, and whether this corresponded to intact viral particles.

A number of potential natural mimickers that can generate intracellular groups of round vesicles mimicking SARS-CoV-2 virions could be listed, the most likely being endocytic vesicles and endosomal compartment components such as microvesicular bodies containing exosomes, among others. 

Endocytosis leads to the formation of 60–120 nm vesicles, which is within the size range described for SARS-CoV-2 (60–140 nm). 

These endocytic vesicles may be coated by different proteins, one of the most common being clathrin. 

The presence of coating proteins may be responsible for the presence of an electron-dense area surrounding these vesicles, giving the appearance of a viral corona. 

The presence of clathrin-mediated endocytosis is well described in proximal tubule cells. 

Podocytes also rely on both clathrin-mediated as well as clathrin-independent endocytic processes to maintain the filtration barrier by regulating the uptake of integrins and lipoproteins. 

During podocyte development or after injury, the clathrin-independent pathway of raft-mediated endocytosis of nephrin and podocin has been shown to be important for proper slit diaphragm spatiotemporal orientation. 

Given its role in nephrin and podocin trafficking and distribution, it is possible that the formation of endocytic vesicles is increased in proteinuric states that are associated with loss of filtration barrier function and podocyte cytoskeletal and basement membrane remodeling. 

Indeed, Farquahr et al. in their seminal studies of the glomerular ultrastructure, in the 1950s, described an increased number of cytoplasmic vesicles in children with nephrotic syndrome. 

Moreover, albumin endocytosis by podocytes has been demonstrated, in vitro and in vivo, in a mouse model of puromycin-induced nephrotic syndrome and could contribute to an increased number of cytoplasmic vesicles in albuminuric diseases.

Proteinuria is a common finding in COVID-19, and has been described in up to 63% of patients at some point during the disease course. 

Moreover, the development of kidney injury in patients with COVID-19 has been associated with increased in-hospital mortality. 

Therefore, it is possible that autopsy series are enriched with those patients, which thus increases the probability of finding endocytic vesicles due to podocyte injury; however, specific data regarding proteinuria was mostly not available in the largest series reported to date which focused on renal pathologic findings. 

Proximal tubular cells also strongly rely on endocytic processes to fulfill their function of reabsorbing filtered macromolecules, which can be accomplished both through receptor-mediated endocytosis as well as fluid-phase endocytosis.

Alternatively, the viral-like inclusions could represent microvesicular bodies containing exosomes before their release onto the cell surface. 

Exosomes form within the endosomal compartment as intraluminal vesicles within microvesicular bodies, which eventually fuse with the plasma membrane and are released. 

Virtually all segments of the kidney in contact with the urinary space can give rise to exosomes, including podocytes. 

Recently, a model of albumin transcytosis has been proposed, through which albumin is initially endocytosed at the capillary aspect of the podocyte and subsequently exocytosed through the apical podocyte membrane within exosomes that can be detected in the urine. 

The podocytic origin of these exosomes is confirmed by the presence of proteins typical of the podocyte cell body, such as podocalyxin. 

This again could contribute to increased numbers of cytoplasmic vesicles within podocytes in patients with COVID-19 who are proteinuric, and could lead to the mistaken assumption that these represent virions. 

Individual exosome sizes vary, but they are generally between 30 and 150 nm, which falls within the size range reported for SARS coronaviruses. 

The potential for confusion of coronavirus particles with normal cellular components was in fact highlighted in a detailed ultrastructural study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the SARS-CoV responsible for the 2003 SARS outbreak. 

The authors recommended that, in clinical specimens, the viral nature of inclusions should be confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy for viral antigens or ultrastructural viral RNA in situ hybridization.

Recognition of this pitfall of "viral-like particles" actually dates back to the 1970s, when the potential for mistakenly assuming that normal cellular components, such as phagocytic vacuoles, microvesicular bodies, or extracellular breakdown products, could represent viral particles was emphasized after a proliferation of studies claiming to have found ultrastructural viral particles within different types of cancer cells and fluids. 

Thus, we would like to echo the CDC and earlier authors’ observations and issue a note of caution regarding the use of ultrastructural images as evidence of SARS-CoV-2 tissue infection without confirmatory evidence of viral proteins or RNA in the tissue through immunoelectron microscopy or in situ hybridization.

CORONAVIRUUS 

AND 

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

 What is SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19?

Coronaviruses are common causes of usually mild to moderate upper respiratory tract illnesses like the common cold, with symptoms that may include runny nose, fever, sore throat, cough, or a general feeling of being ill. 

However, a new coronavirus called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged and spread to cause the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19, which means Coronavirus disease 2019, is an infectious disease that can affect people of all ages in many ways. 

It is most dangerous when the virus spreads from the upper respiratory tract into the lungs to cause viral pneumonia and lung damage leading to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). 

When severe, this impairs the body’s ability to maintain critical levels of oxygen in the blood stream—which can cause multiple body systems to fail and can be fatal.

What do we know about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 on the nervous system?

Much of the research to date has focused on the acute infection and saving lives. 

These strategies have included preventing infection with vaccines, treating COVID-19 symptoms with medicines or antibodies, and reducing complications in infected individuals.

Research shows the many neurological symptoms of COVID-19 are likely a result of the body’s widespread immune response to infection rather than the virus directly infecting the brain or nervous system. 

In some people, the SARS-CoV-2 infection causes an overreactive response of the immune system which can also damage body systems. 

Changes in the immune system have been seen in studies of the cerebrospinal fluid, which bathes the brain, in people who have been infected by SARS-CoV-2. 

This includes the presence of antibodies—proteins made by the immune system to fight the virus—that may also react with the nervous system. 

Although still under intense investigation, there is no evidence of widespread viral infection in the brain. 

Scientists are still learning how the virus affects the brain and other organs in the long-term. 

Research is just beginning to focus on the role of autoimmune reactions and other changes that cause the set of symptoms that some people experience after their initial recovery. 

It is unknown if injury to the nervous system or other body organs cause lingering effects that will resolve over time, or whether COVID-19 infection sets up a more persistent or even chronic disorder.

What are the immediate (acute) effects of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 on the brain?

Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus will have no or mild to moderate symptoms associated with the brain or nervous system. 

However, most hospitalized patients do have symptoms related to the brain or nervous system, most commonly including muscle aches, headaches, dizziness, and altered taste and smell. 

Some people with COVID-19 either initially have, or develop in the hospital, a dramatic state of confusion called delirium. 

Although rare, COVID-19 can cause seizures or major strokes. 

Muscular weakness, nerve injury, and pain syndromes are common in people who require intensive care during infections. 

There are also very rare reports of conditions that develop after SARS-CoV-2 infection, as they sometimes do with other types of infections. 

These disorders of inflammation in the nervous system include Guillain-Barré syndrome (which affects nerves), transverse myelitis (which affects the spinal cord), and acute necrotizing leukoencephalopathy (which affects the brain).

Bleeding in the brain, weakened blood vessels, and blood clots in acute infection.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus attaches to a specific molecule (called a receptor) on the surface of cells in the body. 

This molecule is concentrated in the lung cells but is also present on certain cells that line blood vessels in the body. 

The infection causes some arteries and veins – including those in the brain – to become thin, weaken, and leak. 

Breaks in small blood vessels have caused bleeding in the brain (so-called microbleeds) in some people with COVID-19 infection. 

Studies in people who have died due to COVID-19 infection show leaky blood vessels in different areas of the brain that allow water and a host of other molecules as well as blood cells that are normally excluded from the brain to move from the blood stream into the brain. 

This leak, as well as the resulting inflammation around blood vessels, can cause multiple small areas of damage. 

COVID-19 also causes blood cells to clump and form clots in arteries and veins throughout the body. 

These blockages reduce or block the flow of blood, oxygen, and nutrients that cells need to function and can lead to a stroke or heart attack.

A stroke is a sudden interruption of continuous blood flow to the brain. 

A stroke occurs either when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked or narrowed or when a blood vessel bursts and spills blood into the brain. 

Strokes can damage brain cells and cause permanent disability. 

The blood clots and vascular (relating to the veins, capillaries, and arteries in the body) damage from COVID-19 can cause strokes even in young healthy adults who do not have the common risk factors for stroke.

COVID-19 can cause blood clots in other parts of the body, too. 

A blood clot in or near the heart can cause a heart attack. 

A heart attack or Inflammation in the heart, called myocarditis, can cause heart failure, and reduce the flow of blood to other parts of the body. 

A blood clot in the lungs can impair breathing and cause pain. 

Blood clots also can damage the kidneys and other organs.

Low levels of oxygen in the body (called hypoxia) can permanently damage the brain and other vital organs in the body. 

Some hospitalized individuals require artificial ventilation on respirators. 

To avoid chest movements that oppose use of the ventilator it may be necessary to temporarily "paralyze" the patient and use anesthetic drugs to put the individual to sleep. 

Some individuals with severe hypoxia require artificial means of bringing oxygen into their blood stream, a technique called extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). 

Hypoxia combined with these intensive care unit measure generally cause cognitive disorders that show slow recovery.

Diagnostic imaging of some people who have had COVID-19 show changes in the brain’s white matter that contains the long nerve fibers, or "wires," over which information flows from one brain region to another. 

These changes may be due to a lack of oxygen in the brain, the inflammatory immune system response to the virus, injury to blood vessels, or leaky blood vessels. 

This "diffuse white matter disease" might contribute to cognitive difficulties in people with COVID-19. 

Diffuse white matter disease is not uncommon in individuals requiring intensive hospital care but it not clear if it also occurs in those with mild to moderate severity of COVID-19 illness.

What is the typical recovery from COVID-19?

Fortunately, people who have mild to moderate symptoms typically recover in a few days or weeks. 

However, some  people who have had only mild or moderate symptoms of COVID-19 continue to experience dysfunction of body systems—particularly in the lungs but also possibly affecting the liver, kidneys, heart, skin, and brain and nervous system—months after their infection. 

In rare cases, some individuals may develop new symptoms (called sequelae) that stem from but were not present at the time of initial infection. 

People who require intensive care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, regardless of the cause, usually have a long period of recovery. 

Individuals with long-term effects, whether following mild or more severe COVID-19, have in some cases self-identified as having "long COVID" or "long haul COVID". 

These long-term symptoms are included in the scientific term, Post Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC).

What are possible long-term neurological complications of COVID-19?

Researchers are following some known acute effects of the virus to determine their relationship to the post-acute complications of COVID-19 infection. 

These post-acute effects usually include fatigue in combination with a series of other symptoms. 

These may include trouble with concentration and memory, sleep disorders, fluctuating heart rate and alternating sense of feeling hot or cold, cough, shortness of breath, problems with sleep, inability to exercise to previous normal levels, feeling sick for a day or two after exercising (post-exertional malaise), and pain in muscle, joints, and chest. 

It is not yet known how the infection leads to these persistent symptoms and why in some individuals and not others.

How do the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 relate to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)?

Some of the symptom clusters reported by people still suffering months after their COVID-19 infection overlap with symptoms described by individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). 

People with a diagnosis of ME/CFS have wide-ranging and debilitating effects including fatigue, PEM, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive difficulties, postural orthostatic tachycardia, and joint and muscle pain. 

Unfortunately, many people with ME/CFS do not return to pre-disease levels of activity. 

The cause of ME/CFS is unknown but many people report its onset after an infectious-like illness. 

Rest, conserving energy, and pacing activities are important to feeling better but don’t cure the disease. 

Although the long-term symptoms of COVID-19 may share features with it, ME/CFS is defined by symptom-based criteria and there are no tests that confirm an ME/CFS diagnosis.

ME/CFS is not diagnosed until the key features, especially severe fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and unrefreshing sleep, are present for greater than six months. 

It is now becoming more apparent that following infection with SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, some individuals may continue to exhibit these symptoms beyond six months and qualify for an ME/CFS diagnosis. 

It is unknown how many people will develop ME/CFS after SARS-CoV-2 infection. 

It is possible that many individuals with ME/CFS, and other disorders impacting the nervous system, may benefit greatly if research on the long-term effects of COVID-19 uncovers the cause of debilitating symptoms including intense fatigue, problems with memory and concentration, and pain.

Am I at a higher risk if I currently have a neurological disorder?

Much is still unknown about the coronavirus but people having one of several underlying medical conditions may have an increased risk of illness. 

However, not everyone with an underlying condition will be at risk of developing severe illness. 

People who have a neurological disorder may want to discuss their concerns with their doctors.

Because COVID-19 is a new virus, there is little information on the risk of getting the infection in people who have a neurological disorder. 

People with any of these conditions might be at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19:

1 : Cerebrovascular disease.

2 : Stroke.

3 : Obesity.

4 : Dementia.

5 : Diabetes.

6 : High blood pressure.

There is evidence that COVID-19 seems to disproportionately affect some racial and ethnic populations, perhaps because of higher rates of pre-existing conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and lung disease. 

Social determinants of health (such as access to health care, poverty, education, ability to remain socially distant, and where people live and work) also contribute to increased health risk and outcomes.

Does the COVID-19 vaccine cause neurological problems?

Almost everyone should get the COVID-19 vaccination. 

It will help protect you from getting COVID-19. 

The vaccines are safe and effective and cannot give you the disease. 

Most side effects of the vaccine may feel like flu and are temporary and go away within a day or two. 

In early vaccine development, there were extremely rare reports of unexplained neurological illness following COVID-19 vaccination, but regulators found no evidence the vaccines caused the illness. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to investigate any report of adverse consequences of the vaccine and none have appeared as of yet. 

Consult your primary care doctor or specialist if you have concerns regarding any pre-existing known allergic or other severe reactions and vaccine safety. 

Scientists are studying the risk to benefit ratio of the vaccine in someone who previously developed Guillain Barré syndrome after a vaccination. 

The general sense is the COVID-19 vaccine is safe in individuals whose Guillain-Barré syndrome was not associated with a previous vaccination.

 STORE PROMOTES

"NOT VACCINATED" PATCH 

STYLED ON

NAZI INFAMOUS 

"JUDEN" STAR

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

The store, "hatWRKS", took to Instagram on Friday to promote the new item, which carries the words "Not vaccinated" and is designed around the Nazis’ infamous "Juden" star, perhaps one of the most widely known symbols of the Holocaust.

While the post has since been deleted, screenshots quickly made the rounds online, prompting a torrent of condemnation for the shop and its owner, Gigi Gaskins, who was apparently featured in the Instagram missive sporting the yellow patch.

Activists have used the Star of David badge as an anti-vaccine symbol since well before the Covid-19 outbreak, repeatedly drawing condemnation from Jewish and Holocaust memorial groups.

The fad has carried on more recently as well, with anti-lockdown protesters in London seen wearing the yellow stars just last month.

Earlier this week, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) made waves after comparing workplace vaccine requirements to the Nazi star – comments slammed by fellow Republicans, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. 

"Marjorie is wrong, and her intentional decision to compare the horrors of the Holocaust with wearing masks is appalling," he said in a statement.

Noticing the growing trend, the Unired States Holocaust Memorial Museum issued an open letter on Friday, urging Americans to stop making the comparison. 

It read: "We also watch with great dismay a persistent and increasing tendency in American public life to invoke the Holocaust for the purpose of promoting another agenda."

It is deeply painful for us to see our personal history – the systematic destruction of our families and communities and murder of six million Jewish, (which is a lie) men, women, and children – exploited in this way.

GENERAL FLYNN BELIEVES 

COVID WAS A 

WEAPONIZED OPERATION 

BY CHINA

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

President Trump‘s former national security advisor Michael Flynn commented on the renewed focus on the theory that the coronavirus came from a lab in Wuhan, saying that he believes it was a "weaponised operation".

"We’ve had over a year of people all over the world having to answer tough questions," Flynn said.

The three star general continued "The people in this country are demanding answers. I believe we what we are going to find out is that this was a weaponized operation by the nation of China with some collaboration… with other countries."

While Flynn suggested that the outbreak was "some kind of attack," he also stated that it could have "occurred mistakenly because of poor operational conditions inside these laboratories in China."

He also made it clear that he believes COVID is a real virus, and many older people have really died from it, countering leftist mainstream media claims that he believes the entire pandemic is completely "staged".

"We must demand from our government to know exactly what happened," Flynn urged, adding that "we’ve had the entire country and the entire world shut down, people have lost their livelihoods and businesses… this has caused a massive shift in our entire society."

"The people of this country are not going to stand for just continuing to go down this road of these falsehoods and these lies about the origins of COVID," Flynn asserted.

The lab leak theory has gained traction once again after a previously unseen US intelligence report revealed that at least three researchers working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where coronavirus experiments were being conducted, were hospitalised in mid November 2019 with symptoms matching those of COVID.

Commenting on the revelations, David Asher, the State Department’s former lead investigator on the origins of the virus said it is "very doubtful that three people in highly protected circumstances" all became sick with "severe conditions all in the same week, and it didn’t have anything to do with the coronavirus."

Asher has previously said that the intelligence points to an involvement of the Chinese military conducting bioweapons research at the lab.

Previous reports have suggested that the Wuhan Institute took a shipment of some of the world’s deadliest pathogens just weeks before the outbreak of the coronavirus. 

It is also known that the lab was tampering with natural pathogens and mutating them to become more infectious through "gain of function" research.

This is the "weaponisation" that General Flynn is referring to.

A deadly virus leak from a Chinese lab is not unprecedented. 

The SARS virus escaped twice from the Chinese Institute of Virology in Beijing in 2004, one year after its spread was brought under control.

Flynn previously urged that there needs to be further analysis of previous government pandemic "exercises" that almost completely match what unfolded with the coronavirus.

The unexamined evidence consists of "databases of Chinese communications, the movement of lab workers and the pattern of the outbreak of the disease around the city of Wuhan," according to General Flynn.

We are also leaning on America’s allies to produce similar evidence following the revelation, provided to the U.S. by one such ally, that three lab workers got sick and had to be hospitalized from COVID-19 symptoms in November 2019, two months before China was still telling the WHO there was no "human to human transmission" of the virus.

According to President Trump‘s former national security advisor Michael Flynn, COVID-19 "was a weaponized operation by the nation of China with some collaboration… with other countries."

 ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION

PREDICTED

COVID-19 IN 2010

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

2010 Rockefeller "Lock Step" Document Coming To Life Right Now. Time To Wake Up.

The report titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development has a stated goal of creating "a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."

"A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues… An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge… An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems."

Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the New World Order (NWO) Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. 

It is also a fine example of predictive programming.

In actuality, they are blueprints written by key insiders who already know the game plan and the agenda, and have the power to make it happen.

This document expresses 4 scenarios:

1 : Lock Step -- Tighter Top Down Government Control and Growing Citizen Pushback.

2 : Hack Attack --- Unstable Shock Prone World In Which Criminals Thrive.

3 : Smart Scramble -- Economically Depressed World With Make Shift Solution To Ever Growing Problems.

4 : Clever Together -- A Highly Coordinated Global Government Where Successful Strategies For Solving All Problems Emerges.

The scenario "Lock Step", one of four included in a publication called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society.

Remove such obstacles as "individual rights" and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation states. (remember, this was written in 2010): 

"A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery."

The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. 

First and third world nations alike follow suit by "flexing their authority" and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other "airtight rules and restrictions" – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. 

"In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who "willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight." 

Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. 

It takes over a decade for people to "grow weary" of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. 

After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality.

Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many scientists, statesmen, and alternative media, have raised the alarm about coronavirus. 

Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus "rumors," and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. 

"I am not saying this is or is not true. I just find it interesting that you can not find ANY of this information online anymore. Don't you find that odd?".

Remember, this document is looking at a future scenario from its publish date of 2010, which was ten years ago. 

The Rockefeller Foundation paints a disturbing picture, a future pandemic that kills 8 million people in just 7 months. 

Looking at the present, the Coronavirus has not killed anywhere near that number. 

Most of those who died from Coronavirus had chronic health issues to begin with. 

They are the same people who would have died from the Seasonal Flu.

More in the document: "The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers."

Without Government Intervention Virus Spreads.

The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.

Translation: In the absence of an authoritarian government, the virus was able to spread.

By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation is embracing and promoting authoritarian government. 

In their scenario, they are seeking to remove the rights of the people in order to prevent the virus from spreading. 

In their mind, during a Pandemic or other similar event, the government must overturn the law and become authoritarian.

In developed countries, containment was a challenge. 

The United States’s initial policy of "strongly discouraging" citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.

In the mind of the Rockefeller Foundation, our Constitution amounts to "leniency". 

Therefore, our Constitution should have been suspended, and replaced with authoritarian government in order to contain the spread of the future virus. 

This is a clear violation of our basic God-given rights. (remember, this was written in 2010).

"However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery."

The globalist Rockefeller Foundation praises Communist China for their authoritarian actions, remember, this was a future scenario, not reality. 

However, this is exactly what happened in China! 

They were indeed the first to lock down their nation, and the rest of the world followed suit.

By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation explains Communism, which is authoritarianism protecting the people. 

Of course, this is always how globalists spin their propaganda, "it's for the good of the people".  

In reality, our freedoms are removed for the good of global government, not for the people.

From the 2010 document: "During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets." (ummmm, sound familiar?)

If it is hard for you to differentiate this future scenario from reality, you are not alone. 

Their future scenario is our reality, just look at what is happening right now.

"Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified."

Not only will these authoritarian controls remain according to the Rockefeller Foundation, but they will intensify. 

That means our freedom and rights will continue to be removed, not just in the United States, but globally. 

Have you heard of "The Great Reset"?

"In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

Just a snippet of info about the Rockefellers:

The Rockefeller family has been in the forefront of eugenics-the science of population control, since 1902.  

In 1952, David Rockefeller’s eldest brother John established the Population Council. 

In the subsequent decades, the eugenics program developed, tested, and implemented various bio-warfare tools, as a means of controlling population growth. 

Since then, efforts at creating the necessary infrastructure, research bodies, lab testing and experimentations, have proceeded till the present day. 

By the end of 1945, the dominant force in America was the 5 Rockefeller brothers. 

Their mandate was to take control of the entire globe, and to eliminate any rivals on its quest for global dominance.

Even Adolf Hitler’s extermination policies against Jews and other minorities, was funded by the Rockefeller family.

Starting in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the first fruits of their research yielded the AIDS virus, which devastated many Third World nations. 

This was followed by more exotic viruses such as SARS, MERS 2000, Ebola, the Avian flu, etc.