CORONAVIRUUS 

AND 

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

 What is SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19?

Coronaviruses are common causes of usually mild to moderate upper respiratory tract illnesses like the common cold, with symptoms that may include runny nose, fever, sore throat, cough, or a general feeling of being ill. 

However, a new coronavirus called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged and spread to cause the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19, which means Coronavirus disease 2019, is an infectious disease that can affect people of all ages in many ways. 

It is most dangerous when the virus spreads from the upper respiratory tract into the lungs to cause viral pneumonia and lung damage leading to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). 

When severe, this impairs the body’s ability to maintain critical levels of oxygen in the blood stream—which can cause multiple body systems to fail and can be fatal.

What do we know about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 on the nervous system?

Much of the research to date has focused on the acute infection and saving lives. 

These strategies have included preventing infection with vaccines, treating COVID-19 symptoms with medicines or antibodies, and reducing complications in infected individuals.

Research shows the many neurological symptoms of COVID-19 are likely a result of the body’s widespread immune response to infection rather than the virus directly infecting the brain or nervous system. 

In some people, the SARS-CoV-2 infection causes an overreactive response of the immune system which can also damage body systems. 

Changes in the immune system have been seen in studies of the cerebrospinal fluid, which bathes the brain, in people who have been infected by SARS-CoV-2. 

This includes the presence of antibodies—proteins made by the immune system to fight the virus—that may also react with the nervous system. 

Although still under intense investigation, there is no evidence of widespread viral infection in the brain. 

Scientists are still learning how the virus affects the brain and other organs in the long-term. 

Research is just beginning to focus on the role of autoimmune reactions and other changes that cause the set of symptoms that some people experience after their initial recovery. 

It is unknown if injury to the nervous system or other body organs cause lingering effects that will resolve over time, or whether COVID-19 infection sets up a more persistent or even chronic disorder.

What are the immediate (acute) effects of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 on the brain?

Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus will have no or mild to moderate symptoms associated with the brain or nervous system. 

However, most hospitalized patients do have symptoms related to the brain or nervous system, most commonly including muscle aches, headaches, dizziness, and altered taste and smell. 

Some people with COVID-19 either initially have, or develop in the hospital, a dramatic state of confusion called delirium. 

Although rare, COVID-19 can cause seizures or major strokes. 

Muscular weakness, nerve injury, and pain syndromes are common in people who require intensive care during infections. 

There are also very rare reports of conditions that develop after SARS-CoV-2 infection, as they sometimes do with other types of infections. 

These disorders of inflammation in the nervous system include Guillain-Barré syndrome (which affects nerves), transverse myelitis (which affects the spinal cord), and acute necrotizing leukoencephalopathy (which affects the brain).

Bleeding in the brain, weakened blood vessels, and blood clots in acute infection.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus attaches to a specific molecule (called a receptor) on the surface of cells in the body. 

This molecule is concentrated in the lung cells but is also present on certain cells that line blood vessels in the body. 

The infection causes some arteries and veins – including those in the brain – to become thin, weaken, and leak. 

Breaks in small blood vessels have caused bleeding in the brain (so-called microbleeds) in some people with COVID-19 infection. 

Studies in people who have died due to COVID-19 infection show leaky blood vessels in different areas of the brain that allow water and a host of other molecules as well as blood cells that are normally excluded from the brain to move from the blood stream into the brain. 

This leak, as well as the resulting inflammation around blood vessels, can cause multiple small areas of damage. 

COVID-19 also causes blood cells to clump and form clots in arteries and veins throughout the body. 

These blockages reduce or block the flow of blood, oxygen, and nutrients that cells need to function and can lead to a stroke or heart attack.

A stroke is a sudden interruption of continuous blood flow to the brain. 

A stroke occurs either when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked or narrowed or when a blood vessel bursts and spills blood into the brain. 

Strokes can damage brain cells and cause permanent disability. 

The blood clots and vascular (relating to the veins, capillaries, and arteries in the body) damage from COVID-19 can cause strokes even in young healthy adults who do not have the common risk factors for stroke.

COVID-19 can cause blood clots in other parts of the body, too. 

A blood clot in or near the heart can cause a heart attack. 

A heart attack or Inflammation in the heart, called myocarditis, can cause heart failure, and reduce the flow of blood to other parts of the body. 

A blood clot in the lungs can impair breathing and cause pain. 

Blood clots also can damage the kidneys and other organs.

Low levels of oxygen in the body (called hypoxia) can permanently damage the brain and other vital organs in the body. 

Some hospitalized individuals require artificial ventilation on respirators. 

To avoid chest movements that oppose use of the ventilator it may be necessary to temporarily "paralyze" the patient and use anesthetic drugs to put the individual to sleep. 

Some individuals with severe hypoxia require artificial means of bringing oxygen into their blood stream, a technique called extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). 

Hypoxia combined with these intensive care unit measure generally cause cognitive disorders that show slow recovery.

Diagnostic imaging of some people who have had COVID-19 show changes in the brain’s white matter that contains the long nerve fibers, or "wires," over which information flows from one brain region to another. 

These changes may be due to a lack of oxygen in the brain, the inflammatory immune system response to the virus, injury to blood vessels, or leaky blood vessels. 

This "diffuse white matter disease" might contribute to cognitive difficulties in people with COVID-19. 

Diffuse white matter disease is not uncommon in individuals requiring intensive hospital care but it not clear if it also occurs in those with mild to moderate severity of COVID-19 illness.

What is the typical recovery from COVID-19?

Fortunately, people who have mild to moderate symptoms typically recover in a few days or weeks. 

However, some  people who have had only mild or moderate symptoms of COVID-19 continue to experience dysfunction of body systems—particularly in the lungs but also possibly affecting the liver, kidneys, heart, skin, and brain and nervous system—months after their infection. 

In rare cases, some individuals may develop new symptoms (called sequelae) that stem from but were not present at the time of initial infection. 

People who require intensive care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, regardless of the cause, usually have a long period of recovery. 

Individuals with long-term effects, whether following mild or more severe COVID-19, have in some cases self-identified as having "long COVID" or "long haul COVID". 

These long-term symptoms are included in the scientific term, Post Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC).

What are possible long-term neurological complications of COVID-19?

Researchers are following some known acute effects of the virus to determine their relationship to the post-acute complications of COVID-19 infection. 

These post-acute effects usually include fatigue in combination with a series of other symptoms. 

These may include trouble with concentration and memory, sleep disorders, fluctuating heart rate and alternating sense of feeling hot or cold, cough, shortness of breath, problems with sleep, inability to exercise to previous normal levels, feeling sick for a day or two after exercising (post-exertional malaise), and pain in muscle, joints, and chest. 

It is not yet known how the infection leads to these persistent symptoms and why in some individuals and not others.

How do the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 relate to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)?

Some of the symptom clusters reported by people still suffering months after their COVID-19 infection overlap with symptoms described by individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). 

People with a diagnosis of ME/CFS have wide-ranging and debilitating effects including fatigue, PEM, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive difficulties, postural orthostatic tachycardia, and joint and muscle pain. 

Unfortunately, many people with ME/CFS do not return to pre-disease levels of activity. 

The cause of ME/CFS is unknown but many people report its onset after an infectious-like illness. 

Rest, conserving energy, and pacing activities are important to feeling better but don’t cure the disease. 

Although the long-term symptoms of COVID-19 may share features with it, ME/CFS is defined by symptom-based criteria and there are no tests that confirm an ME/CFS diagnosis.

ME/CFS is not diagnosed until the key features, especially severe fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and unrefreshing sleep, are present for greater than six months. 

It is now becoming more apparent that following infection with SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, some individuals may continue to exhibit these symptoms beyond six months and qualify for an ME/CFS diagnosis. 

It is unknown how many people will develop ME/CFS after SARS-CoV-2 infection. 

It is possible that many individuals with ME/CFS, and other disorders impacting the nervous system, may benefit greatly if research on the long-term effects of COVID-19 uncovers the cause of debilitating symptoms including intense fatigue, problems with memory and concentration, and pain.

Am I at a higher risk if I currently have a neurological disorder?

Much is still unknown about the coronavirus but people having one of several underlying medical conditions may have an increased risk of illness. 

However, not everyone with an underlying condition will be at risk of developing severe illness. 

People who have a neurological disorder may want to discuss their concerns with their doctors.

Because COVID-19 is a new virus, there is little information on the risk of getting the infection in people who have a neurological disorder. 

People with any of these conditions might be at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19:

1 : Cerebrovascular disease.

2 : Stroke.

3 : Obesity.

4 : Dementia.

5 : Diabetes.

6 : High blood pressure.

There is evidence that COVID-19 seems to disproportionately affect some racial and ethnic populations, perhaps because of higher rates of pre-existing conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and lung disease. 

Social determinants of health (such as access to health care, poverty, education, ability to remain socially distant, and where people live and work) also contribute to increased health risk and outcomes.

Does the COVID-19 vaccine cause neurological problems?

Almost everyone should get the COVID-19 vaccination. 

It will help protect you from getting COVID-19. 

The vaccines are safe and effective and cannot give you the disease. 

Most side effects of the vaccine may feel like flu and are temporary and go away within a day or two. 

In early vaccine development, there were extremely rare reports of unexplained neurological illness following COVID-19 vaccination, but regulators found no evidence the vaccines caused the illness. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to investigate any report of adverse consequences of the vaccine and none have appeared as of yet. 

Consult your primary care doctor or specialist if you have concerns regarding any pre-existing known allergic or other severe reactions and vaccine safety. 

Scientists are studying the risk to benefit ratio of the vaccine in someone who previously developed Guillain Barré syndrome after a vaccination. 

The general sense is the COVID-19 vaccine is safe in individuals whose Guillain-Barré syndrome was not associated with a previous vaccination.

 STORE PROMOTES

"NOT VACCINATED" PATCH 

STYLED ON

NAZI INFAMOUS 

"JUDEN" STAR

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

The store, "hatWRKS", took to Instagram on Friday to promote the new item, which carries the words "Not vaccinated" and is designed around the Nazis’ infamous "Juden" star, perhaps one of the most widely known symbols of the Holocaust.

While the post has since been deleted, screenshots quickly made the rounds online, prompting a torrent of condemnation for the shop and its owner, Gigi Gaskins, who was apparently featured in the Instagram missive sporting the yellow patch.

Activists have used the Star of David badge as an anti-vaccine symbol since well before the Covid-19 outbreak, repeatedly drawing condemnation from Jewish and Holocaust memorial groups.

The fad has carried on more recently as well, with anti-lockdown protesters in London seen wearing the yellow stars just last month.

Earlier this week, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) made waves after comparing workplace vaccine requirements to the Nazi star – comments slammed by fellow Republicans, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. 

"Marjorie is wrong, and her intentional decision to compare the horrors of the Holocaust with wearing masks is appalling," he said in a statement.

Noticing the growing trend, the Unired States Holocaust Memorial Museum issued an open letter on Friday, urging Americans to stop making the comparison. 

It read: "We also watch with great dismay a persistent and increasing tendency in American public life to invoke the Holocaust for the purpose of promoting another agenda."

It is deeply painful for us to see our personal history – the systematic destruction of our families and communities and murder of six million Jewish, (which is a lie) men, women, and children – exploited in this way.

GENERAL FLYNN BELIEVES 

COVID WAS A 

WEAPONIZED OPERATION 

BY CHINA

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

President Trump‘s former national security advisor Michael Flynn commented on the renewed focus on the theory that the coronavirus came from a lab in Wuhan, saying that he believes it was a "weaponised operation".

"We’ve had over a year of people all over the world having to answer tough questions," Flynn said.

The three star general continued "The people in this country are demanding answers. I believe we what we are going to find out is that this was a weaponized operation by the nation of China with some collaboration… with other countries."

While Flynn suggested that the outbreak was "some kind of attack," he also stated that it could have "occurred mistakenly because of poor operational conditions inside these laboratories in China."

He also made it clear that he believes COVID is a real virus, and many older people have really died from it, countering leftist mainstream media claims that he believes the entire pandemic is completely "staged".

"We must demand from our government to know exactly what happened," Flynn urged, adding that "we’ve had the entire country and the entire world shut down, people have lost their livelihoods and businesses… this has caused a massive shift in our entire society."

"The people of this country are not going to stand for just continuing to go down this road of these falsehoods and these lies about the origins of COVID," Flynn asserted.

The lab leak theory has gained traction once again after a previously unseen US intelligence report revealed that at least three researchers working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where coronavirus experiments were being conducted, were hospitalised in mid November 2019 with symptoms matching those of COVID.

Commenting on the revelations, David Asher, the State Department’s former lead investigator on the origins of the virus said it is "very doubtful that three people in highly protected circumstances" all became sick with "severe conditions all in the same week, and it didn’t have anything to do with the coronavirus."

Asher has previously said that the intelligence points to an involvement of the Chinese military conducting bioweapons research at the lab.

Previous reports have suggested that the Wuhan Institute took a shipment of some of the world’s deadliest pathogens just weeks before the outbreak of the coronavirus. 

It is also known that the lab was tampering with natural pathogens and mutating them to become more infectious through "gain of function" research.

This is the "weaponisation" that General Flynn is referring to.

A deadly virus leak from a Chinese lab is not unprecedented. 

The SARS virus escaped twice from the Chinese Institute of Virology in Beijing in 2004, one year after its spread was brought under control.

Flynn previously urged that there needs to be further analysis of previous government pandemic "exercises" that almost completely match what unfolded with the coronavirus.

The unexamined evidence consists of "databases of Chinese communications, the movement of lab workers and the pattern of the outbreak of the disease around the city of Wuhan," according to General Flynn.

We are also leaning on America’s allies to produce similar evidence following the revelation, provided to the U.S. by one such ally, that three lab workers got sick and had to be hospitalized from COVID-19 symptoms in November 2019, two months before China was still telling the WHO there was no "human to human transmission" of the virus.

According to President Trump‘s former national security advisor Michael Flynn, COVID-19 "was a weaponized operation by the nation of China with some collaboration… with other countries."

 ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION

PREDICTED

COVID-19 IN 2010

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

2010 Rockefeller "Lock Step" Document Coming To Life Right Now. Time To Wake Up.

The report titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development has a stated goal of creating "a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."

"A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues… An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge… An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems."

Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the New World Order (NWO) Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. 

It is also a fine example of predictive programming.

In actuality, they are blueprints written by key insiders who already know the game plan and the agenda, and have the power to make it happen.

This document expresses 4 scenarios:

1 : Lock Step -- Tighter Top Down Government Control and Growing Citizen Pushback.

2 : Hack Attack --- Unstable Shock Prone World In Which Criminals Thrive.

3 : Smart Scramble -- Economically Depressed World With Make Shift Solution To Ever Growing Problems.

4 : Clever Together -- A Highly Coordinated Global Government Where Successful Strategies For Solving All Problems Emerges.

The scenario "Lock Step", one of four included in a publication called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society.

Remove such obstacles as "individual rights" and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation states. (remember, this was written in 2010): 

"A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery."

The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. 

First and third world nations alike follow suit by "flexing their authority" and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other "airtight rules and restrictions" – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. 

"In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who "willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight." 

Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. 

It takes over a decade for people to "grow weary" of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. 

After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality.

Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many scientists, statesmen, and alternative media, have raised the alarm about coronavirus. 

Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus "rumors," and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. 

"I am not saying this is or is not true. I just find it interesting that you can not find ANY of this information online anymore. Don't you find that odd?".

Remember, this document is looking at a future scenario from its publish date of 2010, which was ten years ago. 

The Rockefeller Foundation paints a disturbing picture, a future pandemic that kills 8 million people in just 7 months. 

Looking at the present, the Coronavirus has not killed anywhere near that number. 

Most of those who died from Coronavirus had chronic health issues to begin with. 

They are the same people who would have died from the Seasonal Flu.

More in the document: "The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers."

Without Government Intervention Virus Spreads.

The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.

Translation: In the absence of an authoritarian government, the virus was able to spread.

By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation is embracing and promoting authoritarian government. 

In their scenario, they are seeking to remove the rights of the people in order to prevent the virus from spreading. 

In their mind, during a Pandemic or other similar event, the government must overturn the law and become authoritarian.

In developed countries, containment was a challenge. 

The United States’s initial policy of "strongly discouraging" citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.

In the mind of the Rockefeller Foundation, our Constitution amounts to "leniency". 

Therefore, our Constitution should have been suspended, and replaced with authoritarian government in order to contain the spread of the future virus. 

This is a clear violation of our basic God-given rights. (remember, this was written in 2010).

"However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery."

The globalist Rockefeller Foundation praises Communist China for their authoritarian actions, remember, this was a future scenario, not reality. 

However, this is exactly what happened in China! 

They were indeed the first to lock down their nation, and the rest of the world followed suit.

By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation explains Communism, which is authoritarianism protecting the people. 

Of course, this is always how globalists spin their propaganda, "it's for the good of the people".  

In reality, our freedoms are removed for the good of global government, not for the people.

From the 2010 document: "During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets." (ummmm, sound familiar?)

If it is hard for you to differentiate this future scenario from reality, you are not alone. 

Their future scenario is our reality, just look at what is happening right now.

"Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified."

Not only will these authoritarian controls remain according to the Rockefeller Foundation, but they will intensify. 

That means our freedom and rights will continue to be removed, not just in the United States, but globally. 

Have you heard of "The Great Reset"?

"In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

Just a snippet of info about the Rockefellers:

The Rockefeller family has been in the forefront of eugenics-the science of population control, since 1902.  

In 1952, David Rockefeller’s eldest brother John established the Population Council. 

In the subsequent decades, the eugenics program developed, tested, and implemented various bio-warfare tools, as a means of controlling population growth. 

Since then, efforts at creating the necessary infrastructure, research bodies, lab testing and experimentations, have proceeded till the present day. 

By the end of 1945, the dominant force in America was the 5 Rockefeller brothers. 

Their mandate was to take control of the entire globe, and to eliminate any rivals on its quest for global dominance.

Even Adolf Hitler’s extermination policies against Jews and other minorities, was funded by the Rockefeller family.

Starting in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the first fruits of their research yielded the AIDS virus, which devastated many Third World nations. 

This was followed by more exotic viruses such as SARS, MERS 2000, Ebola, the Avian flu, etc.

 FRENCH 

NOBEL PRIZE WINNER

"COVID-19 IS MADE IN LAB"

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

A controversial French Nobel prize-winning scientist has accused biologists of having created SARS-CoV-2 - the virus that causes Covid-19 - in a lab, but the wider scientific community has so far refuted the claim.

Luc Montagnier, who won the Nobel Prize in 2008 for his work on HIV - and who is a very controversial figure in the scientific community - said in an interview this week that "the virus has come out of a laboratory in Wuhan, which has been specialising in these types of coronaviruses since the beginning of the 2000s".

He said: "We have arrived at the conclusion that this virus was created." 

He accused "molecular biologists" of having inserted DNA sequences from HIV into a coronavirus, "probably" as part of their work to find a vaccine against AIDS.

He said that it was not clear how the virus had been able to escape the laboratory, and condemned scientists for doing "the work of a sorcerer’s apprentice".

Professor Montagnier has said that he is not the first to suggest the connection, and added that "a group of renowned Indian researchers" had also tried to publish a study showing that the new coronavirus includes HIV DNA, but were forced to retract their claims and had been "smothered".

The Indian study said that there was "a strange similarity" between the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and VIH-1 - the main cause of HIV - "which is unlikely to be coincidental".

But an article in Le Monde newspaper found that this alleged Indian study had been "pre-published", before it had been read by academic peers a necessary step for any academic paper before it is published in a recognised journal.

After its "pre-publication", the article was widely criticised by the scientific community, with many saying that such similarities were "banal", and very common among similar viruses.

Following intense criticism, the study was later taken down.

The site that pre-published the study, BioRxiv, said that its publications were not peer-reviewed, and that "they should not be considered as conclusions, health advice, clinical guidelines, or to be used by the press as definite information".

The similarity between Covid-19 and HIV has also been noted by Peng Zhiyong, director of intensive care at the Zhongnan university hospital in Wuhan. 

In an interview with official Chinese media site Global Times, he said: "The influence of Covid-19 on the body is like a combination of SARS and AIDS."

The doctor was referring to symptoms of the virus - including its effect on the lungs and immune system - and did not explicitly say that the viruses themselves were in any way similar.

Claims "make no sense"

Professor Montagnier’s claims that the virus was created in a laboratory do not align with the current consensus of the wider scientific community.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has denied any suggestions that the virus was "made in a laboratory".

Currently, it is widely thought that the new coronavirus appeared from a wet market in Wuhan, in China, where many exotic animals are sold.

Étienne Simon-Lorière, virologist at medical research centre l’Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the Agence France-Presse that the theory that the new coronavirus is specifically and deliberately linked to HIV "makes sense".

He said: "These DNA sequences are tiny elements that we find in other viruses of the same family; other coronaviruses in the wild. They are pieces of DNA that actually resemble many DNA sequences in many bacteria, viruses, and plants".

"If we take a word from one book, and see that this word resembles one from another book, can we say that one has copied the other? It’s absurd."

However, the similarities between Covid-19 and HIV - whatever their source - have been used as a basis of some research attempting to find a cure for the virus.

In Spain, one patient was cured of Covid-19 after having received treatment based on lopinavir and ritonavir, two medicines more often used to treat HIV and hepatitis C.

Santiago Moreno, head of infectious diseases at the Ramon y Cajal hospital in Madrid, said: 

"The protease enzyme of SARS-CoV-2 is very similar to that of HIV. This enzyme is fundamental for the virus to be able to replicate itself...The results we have so far with the coronavirus are encouraging."

But there was no suggestion from Dr Moreno that this similarity was due to intentional manipulation of the virus.

Conspiracy theories?

Yet, there is no shortage of conspiracy theories circulating about the claim.

A study by polling agency Ifop - published at the end of March - found that more than 26% of French people believe that the new coronavirus "was intentionally made in a laboratory"; a figure that jumps to 40% among voters of far-right party le Rassemblement National.

A number of right-wing and extreme-far-right figures in France have made reference to Professor Montagnier’s claims - notably on Twitter - with some linking the theory to what they see as a "lack of transparency" from China about the virus.

Controversial claims.

Professor Montagnier is well-known for his radical, and often controversial, views within the scientific community.

One molecular biologist at the national research centre Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Alexis Verger, last week tweeted a "reminder" that the professor is known for being anti-vaccinations, pro-homeopathy, and believes that "water has memory".

He has also been known to attempt to "regenerate DNA sequences from pure water and digitized electromagnetic signals and send them by email", said Dr Verger.

Professor Montagnier caused controversy in the scientific community when, one year after winning the Nobel prize, he claimed that "a good immune system" was enough to protect people against AIDS.

He has also come out in support of the idea that water has memory, a theory defended in 1988 by the late French immunologist Jacques Benveniste, which has since been discredited by the scientific community.

He was also the subject of a public outcry in 2017, when he came out against the French government’s decision to make certain vaccinations mandatory, accusing the policy of "poisoning the next generation little by little".

In response, 106 academic scientists wrote an open letter "calling the professor to order". 

The letter read: "We, academics of medicine, cannot accept that one of our peers is using his Nobel prize status to spread dangerous health messages outside of his field of knowledge."

 PROFESSOR DECLARES

THAT U.S. WAS DEFEATED IN

"BIOLOGICAL WAR"

WITH CHINA

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

A professor with close ties to the Communist Chinese Government has declared that his country "defeated" the U.S. in 2020, winning a biological war, and putting America "back in it’s place".

The comments were made by Chen Ping, a Senior Researcher at The China Institute of Fudan University, a CCP affiliated think tank, and a professor at Peking University.

"The Western model has failed, the 500-year maritime civilization is doomed, the CCP has won and will lead the way of the modernization in the new era after the biology revolution after the 2020 CCPVirus (COVID19) pandemic."

Ping states that "In 2020, China won the trade war, science and technology war, and especially the biological war."

"The achievement is unprecedented. This is an epoch-making historical record," he continues, adding "So for the liberal, America-worshiping cult within China, their worship of the U.S. is actually unfounded."

"After this trade war and biological warfare, the U.S. was beaten back to its original shape," Ping emphasised.

Chen Ping also commented on the 2020 U.S. election, noting "I think Trump’s attempt to restore the declining international status of the U.S. during his 4 years has failed. This failure is not only the failure of Trump’s personal campaign for re-election as president, but also the failure of the neo-liberalism-led globalization of the past four decades led by the U.S. and the UK."

"Therefore, the development and modernization model of the U.S. and Europe is not worthy of China’s imitation and repetition," Ping added.

China Inches Closer To World Domination.

China’s economy has expanded by 18.3% in the first quarter of 2021 compared to the same period last year, marking the biggest increase since China started keeping quarterly records in 1992.

The country has undoubtedly been able to rebound quickly by getting ahead of the pandemic in late 2019, stalling and obscuring the facts of what was unfolding while a criminally compliant World Health Organisation parroted CCP talking points to the rest of the world.

With Trump out of office, America is now at the mercy of the Communist state, with Joe Biden having a long track record of selling out American industry to Chinese investors.

As we recently reported, a group of the world’s leading scientists have urged more investigation into the possibility that the coronavirus pandemic was caused by a leak from Wuhan’s Institute of Virology, saying that the World Health Organisation has dismissed the notion without proper consideration.

Meanwhile, GOP representatives on the House Intelligence Committee have demanded an update from the White House and the Director of National Intelligence on the possibility that the coronavirus leaked from the lab.

The Republicans, led by Ranking Member Devin Nunes also want access to any intelligence on the "gain of function" research that was undertaken at the Wuhan lab in conjunction with US agencies.

As I reported earlier in the year, top US National Security officials have indicated that they believe the most credible theory on the origin of COVID-19 is that it escaped from the Chinese Wuhan laboratory.

 DEATH

BY

SUGAR

By

Søren Nielsen

2021

You`ve probably heard sugar is bad for you.

But, how bad is it, really?

Let`s start with the addictive nature of sugar... it`s more addictive than cocaine!

In one study, animals were offered a choice between two feeding levers: one loaded with sugar or saccharin and the other with cocaine.

94% of the time, animals chose sugar or saccharin over cocaine!

Researchers predict the same result for humans, concluding the reward delivered fron sugar can surpass cocaine in even cocaine-sensitized and -addicted individuals.

Our ancestral environment didn’t offer high concentrations of sweet taste. 

Mother’s milk was sweet, which meant, to our brains, anything with that taste was safe. 

This led us to find ways to get more of that taste, a taste we are not adapted to consume endlessly.

Sugar Dangers!

A new study in the British Medical Journal finds a link between sugary drinks and increased risk of cancer.

The study evaluated over 100,000 healthy French adults with an average age of 42. 

Each were followed for 9 years by taking dietary intake questionnaires, including tracking daily consumption of sugary drinks and 100% fruit juices.

The results show that less than 3.5 ounces of a sugary drink daily increases overall cancer risk by 18% and breast cancer by 22%. 

100% fruit juices are also positively associated with risk of overall cancer.

There was no increased risk found in prostate and colorectal cancer, but this may be due to a higher percentage of women (79%) than men (21%) in the study.

Artificially sweetened beverages did not show an increased risk of cancer, but researchers warn this may be because a very small number of participants consumed diet drinks.

The relationship between a diet rich in refined carbohydrates and sugary foods and drinks has been repeatedly linked to weight gain, insulin resistance (leading to increased risk of obesity), type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s.

The Sugar Conspiracy.

Sadly, the sugar industry has hidden these facts from the public for decades. 

In 1967, the Sugar Research Foundation (known today as the Sugar Association) paid Harvard scientists the equivalent of $50,000 to publish a manipulated review of research on sugar, fat, and their connection to heart disease.

The review was published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, where studies were cherry-picked to downplay the role of sugar in heart disease . . . while pointing the finger at saturated fats.

Blood Sugar: Heart Disease, Dementia + More.

Heart disease, for example, is responsible for 1 in 6 deaths in the US, the leading cause of early mortality in America. 

One study shows that 73% of patients presenting acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) have abnormal blood sugar regulation and 50% have diabetes.

To increase risk of heart disease, blood sugar levels do not have to get that high—prediabetic levels will increase heart health risks. 

In non-diabetics, for example, a 2-hour blood glucose at 96 mg/dL or higher was associated with a twofold increased risk of death from heart disease.

One study concludes the impact of refined sugars on insulin provides compelling evidence that overconsuming added sugars (sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup) may lead to increased risk of coronary heart disease.

A diet of refined foods and sugars increases risk of sugar or glucose molecule glycation (sticking to a protein molecule). 

Glycation has been linked to a host of degenerative and inflammatory health concerns—most notably, age-related cognitive decline, such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

Top 4 Healthy Blood Sugar Strategies.

1 : Exercise daily, combining resistance and aerobic activity.

2 : Avoid processed and refined food. Eat whole, seasonal foods.

3 : Increase consumption of fresh organic vegetables and reduce meat and animal proteins to 10-15% of your diet.

4 : Get 7-9 hours of sleep.

A History of Sugar.

Our blood sugar epidemic’s beginnings reach back 10,000 years to New Guinea, where sugar cane was first domesticated. 

Chewing on a stalk of sugar cane quickly became known as a "panacea" or "cure-all" for any mood or ailment.

By 1000 B.C.E., sugar cane reached the Asian mainland, and by 500 B.C.E., Indian alchemists figured out how to make the white powder version: the new secret recipe and medicinal cure-all that changed the world. 

Even today, Americans consume 22 teaspoons of sugar per day.

Soon, sugar made its way to the Middle East and then Europe, still being touted as a cure-all 1,000 years later. 

Demand for sugar rivaled gold. 

So rare was access to granulated sugar that it was consumed only by the wealthy.

Don’t forget, sugar triggers dopamine receptors in the brain. 

Dopamine is the gotta-have-it-now hormone. 

Soon, the developing world had to have it.

With the Ottoman Empire in full force in 1400 C.E. 

Europeans had to find new tropical territories to grow sugar cane. Many expeditions were commissioned to find suitable land to grow the white powder plant. 

Columbus took sugar cane plants to the Caribbean on his second trip to the New World.

Soon, island after island was converted into sugar fields, with natives doing all the labor. 

When the natives died, they were replaced with African slaves. 

More than 11 million Africans were shipped to the New World as slaves, where millions died, primarily in the name of sugar.

By the 1700s, sugar was not a luxury spice anymore. 

It had become a staple in high demand worldwide. 

One island after another was depleted of its water table reserves and when the crops dried up, a new island was terrorized with sugar cane and slave traders.

Europeans consumed greater and greater quantities of sugar. 

In 1700, the average Englishman consumed four pounds of sugar per year. 

In 1800, 18 pounds a year. 

In 1870, 47 pounds a year. 

By 1900, the average Englishman was consuming 100 pounds per year—more than today’s average American by 23 pounds.

For centuries, the world’s sweet tooth was satisfied on the backs of African slaves and native people.

Sugar Today.

Today, the average American consumes 22.7 teaspoons of sugar each day:

6 tsp. of white granulated sugar

2 tsp. of high-fructose corn syrup

3 tsp. of other sugars (honey, molasses, maple syrup).

While you might find it hard to believe we could consume so much sugar, it is well hidden in processed foods, breads, fruit juices, and healthy snacks.

In 1980, 5.5 million Americans had diabetes. 

By 2015, that number was up to 23 million!

Interestingly, fat makes up a significantly smaller percentage of the American diet than it did 20 years ago, although the low-carb and ketogenic movements are helping bring good fats back into our diet. 

Even so, the intake of sugar has steadily risen and America has gotten fatter and fatter.

While sugar is our new poison, linked to numerous chronic health issues, processed sugar is even worse. 

Americans consume more than half the world’s supply of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a processed sugar linked to weight gain, cardiovascular issues, and cognitive issues now known as type 3 diabetes.

Sucrose vs Fructose.

Research on the woes of HFCS has lead scientists to understand more about the difference between sucrose and fructose. 

Sucrose, or white table sugar, contains glucose, which the body, muscles, and brain can readily use. 

Fructose has a different story and needs to be understood.

Some 22 million years ago, apes in Africa lived on fruits picked right off trees. 

Around 17 million years ago, the earth cooled and the ice caps grew larger, leaving land bridges where the nomadic apes could migrate north.

As the earth cooled, fruit trees were replaced with deciduous trees, and soon what is now Europe and Asia was filled with starving apes. 

At some point, an intelligent genetic mutation occurred that allowed apes to store fructose as fat to endure long winters, rather than burn it quickly as food and energy. 

Many of these apes migrated back into Africa, passing the fructose-storing gene to the original African apes and possibly enabling them to forage for new sources of food.

According to scientists, this mutation was so powerful that only apes with the mutation survived to become our ancestors. 

Today, we carry this same gene, which has made high-fructose corn syrup our new poison.