NASA
FAKE SPACE TRAVEL
FAKE SPACE TRAVEL
THE MOON.
By
Søren Nielsen
2018
"We have lost the ability to go to the Moon"
Astronaut Donald Pettit
"We have lost the ability to go to the Moon"
Astronaut Donald Pettit
Some crazy people in the 1950's thought space travel was easy and possible and persuaded some corrupt politicians to promote it and plenty people jumped on the bandwagon.
There were space clubs everywhere. USA was ready to spend billions on space. All fake. Sending rockets one way are easy but everything else is impossible. So USA faked everything starting late 1950's incl. going to the Moon.
They are still at it. Because now they what to send rocket to Mars and to the Moon.
The media make sure that plenty of people believe the space program, because, the people behind the space program are the same who own the media.
Space Travel.
No man has ever left the Earth in a rocket. I say again, No man has ever left Earth in a ROCKET.
I will show that no human beings have ever been in space and will never be in space in a rocket. Everything about it is propaganda lies since late 1950's.
All is just stupid, simple hoaxes to steal money from the tax payers and create fake jobs etc. It started in the 1950's when some Nazi scientists said human space travel was easy and politicians believed them.
An industry was created. NASA – ESA – JPL and other countries as Russian – China – Japan is participate in the hoax to go to space in a rocket.
NASA opened for business on October 1, 1958. NASA's first high profile program was Project Mercury
This is based on scientifically and personal research and common sense since 1994.
So why did USA lie about it? Easy!
Propaganda works, costs little and plenty money is made.
Money, money, money!
There are many rockets available (or planned) today 2018.
Their inventors suggest that they can easily, e.g. carry human beings to planet Mars.
But none can even carry e.g. human beings to the Moon as NASA said it did 1969 - Apollo 11!
In July 20, 1969 the Apollo 11 moon landing, millions could see Armestrong put his foot down on The Moon as the first man in the human history, to visit another planet.
If you are European, you should ask
The European Space Agency, ESA, how they get their astronauts back to Earth after a trip in space!
The answer you will get is, “No reply.”
Or ask the ESA: Director General J.D. Wörner!
A German, Herr Alexander Gerst has been in space several times, if you ask him how he has gotten or will get back on Earth doing a re-entry after a space trip, you will get is answer from him, “No reply!.”
Why is that? To fool people with fake ESA space travel.
No spacecrafts have since travelled to planets anywhere.
Spacecrafts can only orbit planet Earth but can never return and land again.
Spacecrafts visiting other planets are always Fake News invented by the absurd Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California (the latest nonsense is their Space Cube Sats) and similar outfits all over USA assisting the United States NASA to conquer the Universe.
But also Europe, Japan, Russia, China and many other countries participate in the hoax. WHY!
(Money - Alot of money, that can go to "The secret Space Program".)
To The Moon.
This huge achievement could people around the world see on their TV, via the so bad images that you could hardly see who it was, who went down the ladder.
Then you can ask yourself, were they real on the Moon, or were they somewhere else, like on Earth.
My personlige opinion is that they have never been there and when that is said, I'm going to prove my claim.
For there is more and more evidence that indicates that they have never been there, and that it was all a political game to beat the Russians in just one of those things, for otherwise the Russians was first with all, when it comes to Space and the only thing the Americans was first with, was
"The Moon Landing".
When did the dream start about Space?
Dr. Wernher von Braun (1912–1977) was one of the most important rocket developers and champions of space exploration.
As a youth he became enamored with the possibilities of space exploration by reading the work of science fiction authors. Later, von Braun encountered the work of Hermann Oberth, whose 1923 book "The Rocket into Planetary Space", prompted von Braun to master calculus and trigonometry so he could understand the physics of rocketry.
From his teenage years, von Braun had held a keen interest in space flight, becoming involved in the German Society for Space Travel (VfR) in 1928. As a means of furthering his desire to build large and capable rockets, in late 1932 he went to work for the German army to develop liquid-fuel rockets. Based on his army-funded research, von Braun received a doctorate in physics on July 27, 1934.
The V–2 ballistic missile, was the primary brainchild of von Braun’s rocket team.
After 1937 they worked at a secret laboratory at Peenemünde on the Baltic coast.
A liquid propellant missile 46 feet in length and weighing 27,000 pounds, the V-2 flew at speeds in excess of 3,500 miles per hour and delivered a 2,200-pound warhead to a target 200 miles away. First successfully launched in October 1942.
Von Braun - The Moon - Disney.
We all then know what happen, "Operation Paperclip", all the German rocket scientist came to the United Stats to build rocket and later the atomic bomb.
But in 1960 when JFK talked about to go to the Moon, then Von Braun knew he have an problem.
He knew that they never will go to the Moon, because of the speed to leave Earth`s gravity.
To achieve escape velocity almost instantly, because of the acceleration implied, and also because if there is an atmosphere, the hypersonic speeds involved (on Earth a speed of 11.2 km/s, or 40,320 km/h) would cause most objects to burn up due to aerodynamic heating or be torn apart by atmospheric drag.
For an actual escape orbit, a spacecraft will accelerate steadily out of the atmosphere until it reaches the escape velocity appropriate for its altitude.
In many cases, the spacecraft may be first placed in a parking orbit (e.g. a low Earth orbit at 160–2,000 km) and then accelerated to the escape velocity at that altitude, which will be slightly lower (about 11.0 km/s at a low Earth orbit of 200 km).
The required additional change in speed, however, is far less because the spacecraft already has significant orbital velocity (in low Earth orbit speed is approximately 7.8 km/s, or 28,080 km/h).
The Apollo 11 rocket "Weights In Pounds Mass" was "6,540,000 lb" or "2.970.000 kg" with a payload on 140.000 kg or 310.000 lb, but only to "Low Earth Orbit".
Going into outer space is very expensive. It cost 10.000 dollars to put a pound of anything, just into low-eart orbit.
That is your weight in gold.
Now, to put you on the Moon cost about 100.000 dollars a pound, and put you on Mars, would cost over a 1 million dollars a pound.
That is your weight in diamonds.
The Space Shuttle.
As a vehicle that would fly over 50 times a year. Commuting to space every two week`s is the plan NASA come up with.
If you measure it by taht metric, the program was a complete and utter failure. And The shuttle program did not out the way it was supposed to.
It was supposed to be 10 million dollars a flight, and it ended up 1.2 billion dollars a flight, so you know it missed by 1200 time over.
You look at the space program, "oh, that`s so cool, the space shuttle, that amazing." Then you know, "this is great", and then you really look at it and you realize, "hold it, they`re not going anywhere, they`re not doing anything".
The Space Shuttle it is a bus or a truck flying with cargo up to the space station so that it can be done, which should have been 1994, but it was only in 2010.
The Space Station.
The space station cost over 100 billion dollars, but a lot of the space station was wasteful, because the science done on the space station, was actually minimal.
See, i`m not criticizing the space station, what i`m saying is, what does the space station do for the man on the street.?
They don`t know.
If you have a program, which costs 150 billion dollars, and you ask the person on the street, "what are you getting for this", and they don`t know.
Then NASA missed the vision.
CIA and NASA fake the Moon landing in 1969.
When you look a little deeper on what NASA did to the launch of Apollo 11, they would never have been able to reach it until the time that JFK promised.
Take for example, Armstrong, when he had to test fly landing the module. It crashed, and Armstrong had to use the ejection seat in order not to die in crashed.
So in July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin reached the surface of the moon in front of over 600 million television viewers.
Prior to this event, a decade was marked by an intense race between the two superpowers of the world. 24 billion dollars had Americans used on this mission since Kennedy in 1961 announced that the United States intended to set foot on the moon before the decade was over.
And in front of the 600 million television viewers witnessed an invaluable propaganda and prestige victory for the United States. In addition, the Americans finally managed to cement their technological and scientific superiority.
Thus, the space race, and the contemporary Cold War tensions, including had a major impact on the world's skepticism with the United States, that's why the United States did not take any risk that something could go wrong when sending the first to the moon.
There was so much at stake that they were and willing to make a fake moon landing, killing everyone who will tell their secret about the moon landing.
Not only that, the CIA and NASA have lied to the whole world about the moon landing, and lied about the money they should have been spent on the space program, which they have stolen and used on all their "Deep Black Programs", as it is today, if the President call and asked about the "Deep Black Programs", the man on the phone will say, "If a program like that exists, it`s a "Need to Know and you don`t need to know". and hang up the phone.
That is where we are today, The CIA run`s everything, not NSA - DoD - FBI, The CIA.
NASA talking about going to Mars.
And now, NASA again wants to spend billions of dollars on a new lie. Is it because the computer today has become so good, so it is no problem to make a false landing on Mars, and put 2 to 300 billions dollars in there pocket.
Today, people have not found out to get past "The Van Allen Belt", as NASA's own employees, the inventor of the spacecap, even say that once they have found the solution, they can begin their preparations for a Mars mission.
A mission to Mars cost 541 billion dollars and putting a human on Mars is resource-intensive. With the very high price of having people in space, it is understood that all that can be left is robots, will be left to them. A good example of the way to think about is a new plan for a flight to Mars.
The basic idea is that there is really no reason to land people on Mars. It costs a lot of fuel and supplies, and then there are all the problems with the dust and the frequent dust storms.
And that is why alot of humans in the world today, belive that it`s all fake, just so the super rich, can get more rich and get more power.
If the NASA was number 1 in the world, WHY can`t they show a HD photo from the Moon, and WHY have they not been back on the Moon, and WHY can`t the show a 360 cam shoot from the space station. Why why why why....!
NASA can start there, so the can win the people`s respect of the worlds. When they have do that, then maby we will start to trust NASA again.
Many people look at one as if you're crazy, if you say we have never been on the moon.
Why do I say so?
That's why I'm writing this document to make others realize that it's all a big lie and that they do it to get money for their secret space program. And it exists and has been running since the 1950s and maybe before thanks to the Nazi, and their wonder weapon.
But all that can be read about in my paper on "Opertation Paperclips".
What do NASA say about it.
As we get further away from Earth, we will pass through
"The Van Allen" belts, an area of dangerous radiation.
Radiation like this can harm the guidance systems, on-board
computers or other electronics on Orion. But Orion has
protection. Shielding will be put to the test as the vehicle cut
through the waves of radiation.
Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study.We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.
And here is NASA Flight Engineer Kate Rubins:
"We are really pushing the boundaries in terms of where we`re going forward with exploration, I think humans are naturally driven to do this and this is really the beginning, I think of human beings leaving "low Earth Orbit", I certainly plan on being around to see that."
And Commander Scott Kelly from the space station. It looks like that he know that we never have been to the Moon.
"It is bigger than what we have today. And it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board, as well as landers or other components to destination beyond Earth low orbit."
Right now we can only fly in Earth Orbit.
That is the farthest we can go. The new system we`re building is going to allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore so the Moon, Mars, Asteroids there`s a lot of destiations that we could go to and we`re building these buliding block components in order to allow us to do that eventually."
And here we have one from NASA control center :
"Ones we travel beyond low Earth orbit, the crew will be exposed to larger amounts of radiation. So we have to design both the crew protection systems and our electronic system to withstand this radiation."
And here we have "Astronaut Don Pettit", he talk about, why we can`t go to the Moon and in to space :
" I would go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don`t have the technolgy to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it`s a painful process to build it back again."
"Astronaut Don Pettit" said in 2013 on "TEDx",
"That no man ever left Earth in a rocket" and he called it
"The tyranny of the rocket equation."
Who is Don Pettit.
"Donald Roy Pettit (born April 20, 1955) is an American chemical engineer and a NASA astronaut. He is a veteran of two long-duration stays aboard the International Space Station, one space shuttle mission and a six-week expedition to find meteorites in Antarctica."
So we can say, that he know what he is talking about.
Hang on, "In order to send humans through this region, we need to solve the challenge of getting through the Van Allen radiation belts?"
Didn`t you solve this challenge back in 1969 when astronaut`s where sent to The Moon and subsequently 5 other times after that?
So how is it that we had the technology to achieve this amazing fete back in 1969, but we`re still working on the technology in 2017, almost half a century later.??
I have easily proven my point without a shadow of a doubt. But I`m sure that this damaging evidence is still not enough.
So next time we take this to the next level.
Many people look at one as if you're crazy, if you say we have never been on the moon.
Why do I say so?
That's why I'm writing this document to make others realize that it's all a big lie and that they do it to get money for their secret space program. And it exists and has been running since the 1950s and maybe before thanks to the Nazi, and their wonder weapon.
But all that can be read about in my paper on "Opertation Paperclips".
What do NASA say about it.
As we get further away from Earth, we will pass through
"The Van Allen" belts, an area of dangerous radiation.
Radiation like this can harm the guidance systems, on-board
computers or other electronics on Orion. But Orion has
protection. Shielding will be put to the test as the vehicle cut
through the waves of radiation.
Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study.We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.
And here is NASA Flight Engineer Kate Rubins:
"We are really pushing the boundaries in terms of where we`re going forward with exploration, I think humans are naturally driven to do this and this is really the beginning, I think of human beings leaving "low Earth Orbit", I certainly plan on being around to see that."
And Commander Scott Kelly from the space station. It looks like that he know that we never have been to the Moon.
"It is bigger than what we have today. And it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board, as well as landers or other components to destination beyond Earth low orbit."
Right now we can only fly in Earth Orbit.
That is the farthest we can go. The new system we`re building is going to allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore so the Moon, Mars, Asteroids there`s a lot of destiations that we could go to and we`re building these buliding block components in order to allow us to do that eventually."
And here we have one from NASA control center :
"Ones we travel beyond low Earth orbit, the crew will be exposed to larger amounts of radiation. So we have to design both the crew protection systems and our electronic system to withstand this radiation."
And here we have "Astronaut Don Pettit", he talk about, why we can`t go to the Moon and in to space :
" I would go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don`t have the technolgy to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it`s a painful process to build it back again."
"Astronaut Don Pettit" said in 2013 on "TEDx",
"That no man ever left Earth in a rocket" and he called it
"The tyranny of the rocket equation."
Who is Don Pettit.
"Donald Roy Pettit (born April 20, 1955) is an American chemical engineer and a NASA astronaut. He is a veteran of two long-duration stays aboard the International Space Station, one space shuttle mission and a six-week expedition to find meteorites in Antarctica."
So we can say, that he know what he is talking about.
Hang on, "In order to send humans through this region, we need to solve the challenge of getting through the Van Allen radiation belts?"
Didn`t you solve this challenge back in 1969 when astronaut`s where sent to The Moon and subsequently 5 other times after that?
So how is it that we had the technology to achieve this amazing fete back in 1969, but we`re still working on the technology in 2017, almost half a century later.??
I have easily proven my point without a shadow of a doubt. But I`m sure that this damaging evidence is still not enough.
So next time we take this to the next level.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar