THE CIA

SECRET EXPERIMENTS

AND MK-ULTRA

By

Søren Nielsen

2020

August 16th 1951 madness spreads through the village of "Pont Saint Esprit", in the guard region in France and it has fallen victim to an unexplained tragedy which has affected more than 200 people.

Bouts of madness and hallucinations due to the presence of ergotine in the bread, a posison that affects cereals, has killed several people.

The sale of bread has now been banned.

Dozens of villagers have victim of these bouts of madness. The press describes men terrorized by snakes swirling in their stomachs, a doctor recounts the evening of the 24th of August, where dozens of locals were seized by convulsions like in a night of the apocalypse reports from the victims are terrifying.

"I didn`t sleep for exactly 21 days. Absolutely impossible to close my eyes, despite all the sedatives and sleeping pills that the doctor gave me.

When you don`t sleep for 21 days, your mind works overtime. My young daughter had terrible hallucinations! Standing on her bed, seeing blood falling from the ceiling, from everywhere! Seeing tigers jumping on the top of her, Lions and bears trying to eat her!

And then, while she was crying and screaming, hairs coming out of her mouth, she always thought her mouth was full of hair, and she kept trying to pull them out, but failing."

It`s the first time in France that a whole village has gone mad, it made headlines in the press, who wondered what could have caused this collective hallucination.

The hearses quickly arrived in the village, in total seven deaths and three hundred people and around 50 admitted to psychiatric wards.

"They were really crazy! They saw fire everywhere. They just saw fire."

"They struggled while they could, they screamed...It was horrible, horrible!"

"Some were fighting, slapping each other."

The first dead were buried, the investigators initially thought it was a return of the St. Anthony`s fire, a disease that killed many thousands in the Middle Ages, caused by a parasitic ergo fungus, that attacks cereals.

The Baker was accused of poisoning, then the Miller. Arrested and incarcerated they were released after several months.

They say that their confessions were made under duress and above all the evidence proved their innocence.

It was then thought to be water poisoning, Mercury, fertilizers or a nearby gas factory, but the evidence disapproved these theories one by one.

It was the time of the cold war.

Nothing is clear and for decades the incident goes unexplained, but against all expectations, 60 years later a new theory is proposed, not from France, but from the United States.

An American researcher in the Secret Service`s "Hank Alberti" is investigating the suspicious death of a biochemist from the CIA, "Dr. Frank Olson" a specialist in chemical weapons.

He carried out experiments on hard drugs like LSD. He was also in France a few months before the "Pont Saint Esprit" pre-incident.

Afterwards he kept sinking into depression, telling his wife that he`d made a terrible mistake.

Dr. Frank Olson

It`s all a lie, "Dr. Frank Olson" was killed by "Dr. Sidney Gottlieb".

Dr. Sidney Gottlieb

He personally gave LSD to an unknowing fellow scientist "Dr. Frank Olson" who worked for the Army chemical Corps Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick.

His job was developing biological weapons, "Dr. Frank Olson" committed suicide by jumping through the window of a tenth floor hotel.

"Dr. Gottlieb" concealed his actions and the olson family was unaware of the cause of the suicide, until 27 years later when a faxed emerge during a congressional hearing on CIA abuses.


The link between "Gottlieb" and "Olson", illustrated how the different elements of biological and chemical weapons, radiation testing and "MK-ULTRA" were all intertwined.

You can read all about "MK-ULTRA" and the Nazi`s in my other document called "Germany won World War II".

"Hank Alberti" then made the link with "Pont Saint Esprit" pre-incident.

Could it have been the CIA and the American army spraying LSD onto the bread.

"Hank Alberti" said, "I have no doubt at all, that "Pont Saint Esprit" was a US Army covert experiment."

Is it possible that the American has drugged a entire village in an ally country, causing no doubt accidentally the death of seven people.

Improbable, however

To understand what happened in "Pont Saint Esprit", we need to look back at the end of the Second World War, when the level of atrocities committed by the Nazis was discovered in the camps, notably horrific experiments carried out on thousands of prisoners by chemists or doctors.

Men lacerated poisoned, burnt alive, exposed to radiation.

The Allies hunted the war criminals from Hitler`s regime. In 1946 in Nuremberg, the doctors are put on trial, 22 men and one woman, who experimented on human beings were they transformed into lab rats stand accused.

The trial sets a precedent seven of the accused are sentenced to death, eleven given prison sentences and five are auquitted.

As a result the Americans draft the Nuremberg code. A model which gives strict rules for experimenting on humans, notably:

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

"The experiment must be designed to avoid all unnecessary suffering, physical and mental harm."

With the Nuremberg trial barely over, the winners remain cynical.

The American Secret Service begins "Operation Paperclip" nearly 4500 German scientists, including war criminals are expatriated to America.

They are offered a new life in exchange for their knowledge and cooperation.

It was a very serious game of propaganda that we were playing, it was almost a show trial.

We are putting the Nazis on trial, but in fact behind the curtain we`re doing  some very nasty things ourselves to basically incarcerated people, poor people, individuals who at the time were called feeble-minded, had locked up in institutions and if you were in one of those institutions, whether you were indigent or an unwed mother or had some sort of mental incapacity there`s a good chance that you may have been incorporated in some sort of medical study, possibly for the government or not, where you would have been used and abused.

Assisted by the German scientists, the Americans begin pursuing their goal of the ultimate weapon and everything is allowed in the name of the cold war.

On the one side was the army, whose priority is to win the nuclear arms race.

At the time to test the effects of radiation on a large scale, they used their own soldiers.

Between 1946 and 1962, between 250.000 and 500.000 men, were exposed to radiation in the Nevada desert, they were exposed with no protection, unaware of the risks involved and afterwards, the radiated particles were cleaned up with brooms.

On the other side was the CIA, who was above all interested in psychological manipulation.

Their goal was to create an infallible thuth serum, wipe memories, turn humans into robots and programmed them to kill.

Conveniently in 1948 a researcher in the Sandoz laboratories, "Albert Hoffman" discovers a molecule that ignites the Secret Service.

Lysergic acid diethylamide or LSD. It`s derived from the same rod fungus, long held responsible for the incident at "Pont Saint Esprit".

It was believed that the hallucinogenic properties of this drug, were key to psychological manipulation, fearing that the Russians would get their hands on Sandoz`s samples, the Americans bought all of their stock.

The discovery of LSD was a godsend for the Army, who on the brink of nuclear weapons, were looking for a weapon that could defeat an enemy without firing any weapons.

The man who has headed this program longest was "James Ketchum". He was a psychiatrist who was working for the military.

As a patriot he was prepared to push the boundaries in his research. He tested around 30 drugs, but especially LSD and the dangerous benzoplate.

He treated 7.000 soldiers, hundreds of whom later sued the Army, because of the side effects, that they still experience and attribute to these drugs.

However when questioned "James Ketchum" sees things differently, "I think they`re very patriotic have not been given credit they`ve been called innocent guinea pigs, which they certainly were not.

They knew what they were doing and we told them as much as we could about it. We had to limit the names of the drugs, because some of them were artificially made and if we were to give out the name of course that would also reveal the structure and that we were afraid the Russian hood would get that, they`re apparently following our work.

We thought they were ahead of us, but actually they weren`t and so they were watching what we did to see what they could learn and use and they developed a similar drug later themselves."

UNDERWATER WALL

CIRCLES

THE ENTIRE EARTH

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

The Earth is surrounded by a gigantic wall that can be clearly seen beneath the oceans of our planet thanks to Google Earth.

This wall has been discovered at Greenland and it stretches around more than 11.329 miles along or 18.232 km the ocean, all the way to Antarctica.

Ufologists and conspirators tried more often than not discovered such mysterious things on Google Earth. 

From submerged pyramids to unknowable islands and even massive apertures in the ocean.



Some conspiracy theorists claim that this underwater wall is in fact a failure in the matrix.

Google Earth has managed to unleash people’s imagination ever since it first appeared. For instance, last year a guy discovered the ruins of an unknown city belonging to the Mayans.

This wall in particular features size and linearity that proves it is not a natural formation by any means. This discovery seems to contradict history as we know it. Little by little we start to uncover evidence that suggests lots of civilizations existed long before us.

However, what if the wall is just an anomaly or a glitch? We know that Google Earth uses many different images to create a "mapping". 

In this case, it would not be impossible to consider that many areas featured in this application do not exist in reality.


We don’t know if the wall is real or not, but it is up to you to draw your own conclusions. 

Have a look at the following video for more information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=47&v=PzcSQmJvzqw&feature=emb_logo

WHY IS THE US

HIDES 700 MILLION

BARRELS OF OIL

UNDERGROUND

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

The world’s superpowers store an enormous stockpile of oil in secure caverns and tanks around the world. So why can’t we use it?

Something important, and valuable, has been quietly hidden along America’s Gulf Coast. Across four secure sites in unassuming locations lies nearly 700 million barrels of oil – buried underground. 

A total of 60 subterranean caverns, carved into rock salt beneath the surface, constitute the United States’ massive "Strategic Petroleum Reserve" (SPR).

The facility was set up 40 years ago and there are now many other huge oil stockpiles dotted around the world. In fact, a whole host of countries have poured billions of dollars into developing such facilities and more are on the way. 

But what are these reserves – and why would anyone want to bury oil back into the ground in the first place?


The answer lies in the energy crisis of 1973. Arab oil exporters had cut off the West from their supplies in response to US support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War. 

The world was so dependent on oil from the Middle East that prices skyrocketed and petrol was soon being rationed at US filling stations. In some cases, it dried up completely. 

People feared that any petrol they had might be stolen and a few even took to protecting their cars with firearms.

A couple of years later, the US began building its SPR, filling caverns full of crude oil. Were oil supplies to be severely disrupted in the future, now the US would have its own stores to tide them through a price spike and alleviate pressure on global markets. 

As a government website boasts, "The SPR's formidable size… makes it a significant deterrent to oil import cutoffs and a key tool of foreign policy." 

It’s a neat, but expensive, idea. The current year’s budget for maintaining the SPR is $200m.

The reserve's formidable size makes it a significant deterrent to oil import cutoffs and a key tool of foreign policy

Bob Corbin at the US Department of Energy is the person in charge of making sure that money is spent wisely. 

"All of our sites are located in what we call salt domes," he explains. "The salt is impervious to the crude oil, there’s no mixing, no breaking down, so it’s a great storage facility."

Corbin, who served for 22 years with the military in the US Coast Guard, is proud of the four sites, which stretch from Baton Rouge, Louisiana to the largest of the four, near the tiny city of Freeport, Texas. 

He refers to the vast salt storage chambers as "my caverns". "The sites themselves," he says, "are very impressive."

But there’s not much to see above ground – merely some wellbore heads and pipelines. The wellbores themselves plunge thousands of feet into the caverns below and can push water in at high pressure in order to retrieve the oil through a process of displacement. 

Corbin adds that managing such infrastructure comes with unique challenges. The salt caverns are not completely stable, for example. Sometimes bits of the walls or ceilings may crumble away, causing damage to machinery which has to be carefully replaced. 

It’s not possible for workers to enter the caverns physically so, like drilling oil out of a natural well, it has to be done remotely.

International agreements state that member nations must hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days’ imports.

However, special tools can be used to give a little visibility. "Periodically when caverns are empty you can actually shoot sonar images of the caverns," says Corbin. "And that gives you a three-dimensional way of looking at them." Some have interesting shapes, he adds. 

The outline of one chamber, for example, would resemble a large flying saucer.

America has, in the past, relied on the SPR to help get it out of sticky situations. Take the first Gulf War for example, in which oil distribution in the Middle East was disrupted. 

Or Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when requests for emergency oil were approved within 24 hours of the storm's landfall.

Global stockpiles.

The US is far from the only country which has invested heavily in strategic oil reserves. Japan has a series of sites where well over 500 million barrels of oil are stored in large above-ground tanks. 

The facility at Shibushi, for example is just off-shore. Following the catastrophic earthquake and tsunami which struck Japan in 2011, calls were made to expand the country’s oil stocks in case of crises in the future which might hamper oil distribution again.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) oversees the release of oil from a wide range of reserves internationally. Martin Young is head of the body’s Emergency Policy Division: "When a country signs up to the IEA there are various obligations," he says. "One of the key obligations is to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days’ imports."

But not all countries have salt domes to store oil underground. Nor do all countries even have large, specialised storage facilities for SPR purposes. 

The UK, for instance, has neither. "What the UK has is an obligation on industry to hold oil at their existing sites above what they would normally do," explains Young. 

That oil is quietly kept aside by firms so that the government can access it immediately, if and when it’s needed.

Two nations which are not members of the IEA, India and China, have in recent years ploughed funds into their own SPRs. 

The Chinese in particular have ambitious plans. A diverse array of storage locations, dotted across the land will, it is hoped, eventually store almost as much as the Americans in a combination of state-owned facilities and commercial stockpiles. 

The Chinese don’t have the luxury of salt caverns and have to opt instead for much more expensive storage above ground in tanks. 

They’re easy to spot on Google Earth and in satellite photos – just look for the rows of large white dots. 

The SPR site in Zhenhai is just one of these and it currently holds its full capacity of 33 million barrels. 

"It was big," says Young, who visited the location a few years ago. "What you see is a whole load of oil tanks co-located with a couple of oil refineries."

The Chinese have opted for storage above ground in tanks, as the geology is less suitable

Narongpand Lisapahanya, an oil and gas analyst at investment group CLSA, says that spending money on developing an SPR is all part of China’s plan to be treated seriously as a global superpower. 

"If you’re going to be a superpower, you’re going to have to have the reserve," he says with a laugh. 

"It helps you become part of treaties globally. If another superpower, during energy events, asks for a release of reserves then China can now take part."

No modern superpower, then, is complete without an SPR to call its own. While the growth of reserves around the world is generally welcomed, there are some who worry that countries outside the IEA could use their reserves to manipulate global oil prices by selling off stocks at opportune moments. 

Of course, mitigating nasty price spikes is exactly why SPRs were invented in the first place, as Carmine Difiglio at the US Department of Energy explains: "Protecting the US economy from sharp increases in domestic petroleum product prices was the purpose of the SPR in 1975 and it remains the purpose of the SPR today," he says.

But there’s an important line to draw between that and using an SPR for ad hoc manipulation of the world’s markets. 

On this point, Martin Young is emphatic: "The oil stocks are not there for price management as such," he explains, "they’re there to correct a shortage in the market because of a supply disruption."

In the US, caverns in salt are filled to the brim with crude oil.

There’s a continual debate about how SPR stocks should be used, though. Some people think releases could be more aggressive while others question whether the US has always taken full advantage of its SPR oil, which is valued at roughly $43.5bn. 

"For some folks, 700 million barrels in the ground just looks like a gigantic pot of money," comments Sarah Ladislaw, at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC.

Few, though, would support initiatives to fundamentally change how SPRs are used – in the US or elsewhere. 

The emphasis is definitely on planning for emergencies and mitigating supply problems. 

Governments and the IEA prepare for such situations by working out how they would draw oil from SPRs in the event of a crisis. 

There are even specialist firms which help with this sort of planning, such as EnSys, which has developed a sophisticated computer model to simulate future pricing fluctuations in the oil industry.

This expertise helps EnSys to advise groups which control SPRs as to when and why they might consider distributing oil to local refineries. As CEO Martin Tallett explains, it’s a numbers game. 

By how many barrels will your imports be short during a given crisis? How much would have to be released from an SPR to ease that?

South Korea has access to the reserve of Japan in an emergency.

"What we would do is sit down with somebody and say, OK, there’s disruption in the Middle East, maybe North Africa as well," he says. "And we really start from the numbers rather than spending a lot of time understanding in-depth the geopolitical machinations that could have caused the disruption."

As governments and energy bodies continue planning for the worst, oil stockpiles only look set to get bigger and bigger. It’s obvious that the US and many other countries believe their SPRs are a good investment.

Despite all the preparations, it’s still possible that, during a future crisis, oil might not be distributed quickly enough from the strategic reserves.

Would we get a repeat of 1973? Bob Corbin, for one, won’t say: "I wouldn’t want to speculate on what could or could not occur," he comments. "We’re prepared to deliver whenever we need to."

FIFTH PENTAGON OFFICIAL

ANNOUNCES RESIGNATION

IN SEVEN DAYS

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

The Defense Department’s senior adviser for international cooperation earlier this week left the Pentagon, marking the fifth top official in seven days to leave or announce their departure.

Tina Kaidanow

"Ambassador Tina Kaidanow", a longtime State Department official who began working in her Pentagon role in September 2018, resigned on Dec. 16, the Pentagon confirmed. 

Defense News first reported her departure.

"We appreciate her service to the department and wish her continued success. ... The department remains committed to the development and implementation of international cooperative programs and defense exportability efforts to foster cooperation with U.S. allies on research, development, production and support of weapons systems and related equipment," a Department of Defense (DOD) spokesman said in a statement.

"The department will not provide anything further on this personnel matter," the spokesman added.

Michael Vaccaro

"Michael Vaccaro", the director for international armaments cooperation, will serve as the acting senior adviser.

Kaidanow’s resignation follows four other announced departures within a week.

 
Randall Schriver                                                      Steven Walker                                                     Kari Bingen

Those include the Dec. 12 notification that top Asia policy official "Randall Schriver" would leave after two years on the job, the Dec. 13 announcement that top official in charge of personnel and readiness "Jimmy Stewart" had resigned after taking the role in October 2018 the Tuesday report that Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency leader "Steven Walker" will leave in January, and the news earlier Wednesday that Principal Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence "Kari Bingen" submitted her resignation on Dec. 5 and will leave Jan. 10.


Kaidanow worked under the Pentagon’s acquisition and sustainment office focusing on "the development and implementation of international cooperative programs" to bring "cooperation with U.S. allies on research, development, production and support of weapons systems and related equipment," according to her DOD bio page.

She worked with top weapons buyer Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment "Ellen Lord" and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency to boost weapon sales with partner and ally countries.

Ellen Lord

Before that, she served as the principal deputy assistant secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, working as the "principal liaison" with DOD  and managing "several critical components of U.S. foreign policy, including the maintenance of the State Department’s global security relationships."


In addition, she served as ambassador-at-large and coordinator for counterterrorism, the deputy ambassador at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul and the first U.S. ambassador to Kosovo.