ALIEN

TELLS THE TRUTH

ABOUT EARTH

 PART 3

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

This is one of several document reels discovered in an undisclosed government location. Its presented in its raw and unedited form.

06.09.1964. - Document number 220675

Q: So tell me when does the nuclear war start?

A: It is not my place to change history.

Q: So now tell me...when does the nuclear war start?

A: Just over one half century from this point in time.

Q: By whom?

A: Nuclear war will begin in this country.

Q: Really? Us? How?

A: A human male will briefly rule your country and will be responsible for the destruction of most of your species.

Q: Interesting. So is he alive now?

A: Yes.

Q: So just tell me his name and we`ll kill him.

A: I cannot. The name was removed from our historical record. We cannot allow altering history through murder.

Q: Just tell me what he does.

A: He will weaken your democratic mechanism by appealing to your species most primitive instincts: Fear. Tribalism. Political and religious dogma. There will be international condemnation. In response, he will order a preemptive nuclear strike. This will proliferate into global nuclear war.

Q: So then we blow up?.

A: The initial exchange only ends a few million human lives.

Q: "Only" a million lives.

A: It is the resulting radiation, that will end most of your kind. My species is the evolutionary result.

Q: So how do we stop this?

A: Protect your democracy from political and religious dogma. Protect it from rejection of objective fact. At this point in time your democracy is stable. This will not be the case in a half century.

Q: So if we stop this lunatic from blowing up, we`ll be fine?

A: NO.

Q: But you just said, if we stop him we won`t be destroyed.

A: There....There is another threat.

Q: And what would.........

TO BE CONTINUED...

THE

HOLY BIBLE

TELL US

THAT THE FIRST HUMAN

WAS ALIEN

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

I succeed in getting hold of a true 1611 King James Bible. And I must say I was very surprised when I started reading it.

The First Book of Moses

When you read "The First Book of Moses" also called "Genesis", you can read in chapter I: (Creation of Heaven and Earth), vers: 27 

"So God created man in his (Own) image, in the image of God created he them."

And in chapter V,"Genealogy of the Patriarchs." - "The Book of the generations of Adam", and the Bible tells us about how old "Adam" was.

"Adam" is 130 years when he begat a son in his own likeness, and his name is "Seth". ? (who is Seth) and who is his mother?

And the Bible also tell that "Adam" lived 800 years after he got "Seth".

And that "Adam" died when he was 930 years old.

And (Seth) was 105 years old, when he begat a son called (Enos).

And "Seth" lived 807 years after he got "Enos" and begat sons and daughters.

And "Seth" died when he was 912 years old.

And "Enos" was 90 years old, when he got "Cainan".

And "Enos" lived 815 years after he begat "Cainan" and begat sons and daughters.

And "Enos" were 905 years old when he died.

And "Cainan" lived seventy years, and begat "Mahalaleel"

And "Cainan" lived 840 years, and begat sons and daughters.

And "Cainan" were 910 years old when he died.

And in Chapter II, 
The first Sabbath.

Vers: 8
The lord god planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there he put the man whom he had formed.

Vers: 9
And out of the ground, made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food. (The Tree of Life) also in the midst of the garden, and (The Tree of Knowledge) of Good and Evil.

Vers: 10

And a river went out of (Eden) to water the Garden, and became into four heads.

Vers: 11

And name of the first is (Pison), that is it which compasseth the whole land of (Havilah), where there is (Gold).

Vers: 12

And the (Gold) of that land is good: there is (Bdellium) and the (Onyx Stone).

Vers: 13

And the name of the second river is (Gihon): The same is it that compasseth, the whole land of (Ethiopia).

Vers: 14

And the name of the third river is (Hiddekel): that is it which goeth toward the east of (Assyria). And the fourt river is (Euphrates).

CHAPTER III
The Fall of Man

Vers: 22
And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil, and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever.

CHAPTER IV
Birth of Cain and Abel.

Vers: 2
"Adam" and "Eve", and she conceived, and bare "Cain", and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

And she again bare his brother "Abel".

And now there's something that's not right...

Vers: 17
"Cain" knew his wife?(No Name), and she conceived, and bare "Enoch", and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, "Enoch"

Vers: 18
And onto "Enoch" was born "Irad", and "Irad" begat "Mehujael", and "Mehujael" begat "Methusael", and "Methusael" begat "Lamech"

Vers: 19
And "Lamech" took unto him two wives, the name of the one was "Adah", and the name of the other "Zillah"

CHAPTER V
Genealogy of the Patriarchs.
The Book of the generations of Adam

In the day that God created man in the likeness of God, made he him:

Vers: 2
Male and female created he them and blessed them, and called their name (Adam) in the day, when they were created.

Vers: 3
And (Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, (130 years)), and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image, and calles his name (Seth).

Vers: 4
And the days of (Adam) after he had begotten (Seth), were eight hundred years (800 years), and begat sons and daughters.

Vers: 5
And all the days that (Adam) lived were nine hundred and thirty years (930 years), and he died.

Vers: 6
And (Seth) lived a hundred and five years, (105 years) and begat (Enos)

Vers: 7
And (Seth) lived after he begat (Enos) eight hundred and seven years, (807 years) and begat sons and daughters.

Vers: 8
And all the days of (Seth) were nine hundred and twelve years, (912 years) and he died.

Vers: 9
And (Enos) lived ninety years, (90 years) and begat sons and daughters.

Vers: 10
And (Enos) lived after he begat (Cainan) eight hundred and fifteen, (815 years) and begat sons and daughters.

Vers: 11
And all the days of (Enos) were nine hundred and five years, (905 years), and he died.

CHAPTER VI
The depravity of mankind

Vers: 3
And the Lord said, "My Spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh, yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years"

Vers: 4
There were Giants in the Earth in those days, and also after that, when sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men, which were of old, men of reown.

GLOBAL WARFARE

WE`RE GOING TO TAKE OUT

7 COUNTRIES IN 5 YEARS

(IRAQ - SYRIA - LEBANON - LIBYA - SOMALIA - SUDAN)

ONE TO GO

IRAN

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

Retired 4-star US Army general. Supreme Allied Commander of NATO.

Today, General Wesley Clark, the retired four-star general. He was Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the Kosovo War. 

He has been awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. In 2004, he unsuccessfully ran for the Democratic presidential nomination. 

He recently edited a series of books about famous US generals, including Dwight Eisenhower and Ulysses Grant, both of whom became president after their military careers ended.

General Wesley Clark

Because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw "Secretary Rumsfeld" and "Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz".

I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. 

He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second."

I said, "Well, you're too busy." 

He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." 

This was on or about the 20th of September. 

I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" 

He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." 

So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" 

He said, "No, no." 

He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." 

He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." 

And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."


So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. 

I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. 

And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." 

And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." 

I said, "Is it classified?" 

He said, "Yes, sir." 

I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" 

He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!".

So, go through the countries again.

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and back to Iran. So when you look at Iran, you say, "Is it a replay?" 

It’s not exactly a replay. But here’s the truth: that Iran, from the beginning, has seen that the presence of the United States in Iraq was a threat — a blessing, because we took out Saddam Hussein and the Baathists. 

They couldn’t handle them. We took care of it for them. But also a threat, because they knew that they were next on the hit list. And so, of course, they got engaged. 

They lost a million people during the war with Iraq, and they’ve got a long and unprotectable, unsecurable border. So it was in their vital interest to be deeply involved inside Iraq.

They tolerated our attacks on the Baathists. They were happy we captured Saddam Hussein.

But they’re building up their own network of influence, and to cement it, they occasionally give some military assistance and training and advice, either directly or indirectly, to both the insurgents and to the militias. 

And in that sense, it’s not exactly parallel, because there has been, I believe, continuous Iranian engagement, some of it legitimate, some of it illegitimate. 

I mean, you can hardly fault Iran because they’re offering to do eye operations for Iraqis who need medical attention. That’s not an offense that you can go to war over, perhaps. But it is an effort to gain influence.

And the administration has stubbornly refused to talk with Iran about their perception, in part because they don’t want to pay the price with their domestic — our US domestic political base, the rightwing base, but also because they don’t want to legitimate a government that they’ve been trying to overthrow. 

If you were Iran, you’d probably believe that you were mostly already at war with the United States anyway, since we’ve asserted that their government needs regime change, and we’ve asked congress to appropriate $75 million to do it, and we are supporting terrorist groups, apparently, who are infiltrating and blowing up things inside Iraq — Iran.

And if we’re not doing it, let’s put it this way: we’re probably cognizant of it and encouraging it. So it’s not surprising that we’re moving to a point of confrontation and crisis with Iran.


My point on this is not that the Iranians are good guys — they’re not — but that you shouldn’t use force, except as a last, last, last resort. There is a military option, but it’s a bad one.

I wanted to get your response to Seymour Hersh’s piece in The New Yorker to two key points this week, reporting the Pentagon’s established a special planning group within the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to plan a bombing attack on Iran, that this is coming as the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia are pumping money for covert operations into many areas of the Middle East, including Lebanon, Syria, and Iran, in an effort to strengthen Saudi-supported Sunni Islam groups and weaken Iranian-backed Shias — some of the covert money has been given to jihadist groups in Lebanon with ties to al-Qaeda — fighting the Shias by funding with Prince Bandar and then with US money not approved by Congress, funding the Sunnis connected to al-Qaeda.

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, I don’t have any direct information to confirm it or deny it. It’s certainly plausible. The Saudis have taken a more active role. You know, the Saudis have —

You were just in Saudi Arabia.

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Hmm?

You just came back from Saudi Arabia.

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Yeah. Well, the Saudis have basically recognized that they have an enormous stake in the outcome in Iraq, and they don’t particularly trust the judgment of the United States in this area. We haven’t exactly proved our competence in Iraq. So they’re trying to take matters into their own hands.


The real danger is, and one of the reasons this is so complicated is because — let’s say we did follow the desires of some people who say, "Just pull out, and pull out now." 

Well, yeah. We could mechanically do that. It would be ugly, and it might take three or four months, but you could line up the battalions on the road one by one, and you could put the gunners in the Humvees and load and cock their weapons and shoot their way out of Iraq. 

You’d have a few roadside bombs. But if you line everybody up there won’t be any roadside bombs. Maybe some sniping. 

You can fly helicopters over, do your air cover. You’d probably get safely out of there. But when you leave, the Saudis have got to find someone to fight the Shias. Who are they going to find? Al-Qaeda, because the groups of Sunnis who would be extremists and willing to fight would probably be the groups connected to al-Qaeda. 

So one of the weird inconsistencies in this is that were we to get out early, we’d be intensifying the threat against us of a super powerful Sunni extremist group, which was now legitimated by overt Saudi funding in an effort to hang onto a toehold inside Iraq and block Iranian expansionism.

And interestingly, today, John Negroponte has just become the number two man, resigning his post as National Intelligence Director to go to the State Department, Seymour Hersh says, because of his discomfort that the administration’s covert actions in the Middle East so closely echo the Iran-Contra scandal of the 1980s, and Negroponte was involved with that.

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, I’m sure there are a lot of reasons why John would go back to the State Department. John’s a good — he’s a good man. But, you know, the question is, in government is, can you — are you bigger than your job? Because if you’re not bigger than your job, you get trapped by the pressures of events and processes into going along with actions that you know you shouldn’t. And I don’t know. I don’t know why he left the National Intelligence Director’s position. He started in the State Department. Maybe he’s got a fondness to return and finish off his career in State.

Do you agree with them?

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, I’ll put it this way. On Labor Day weekend of 1994, when I was the J5 — I was a three-star general. 

I was in the Pentagon. And it was a Saturday morning, and so I was in the office. Walt Kross was the director of the Joint Staff, and he was in the office. 

And I think it was either Howell Estes or Jack Sheehan who was the J3 at the time. The three of us — I think it was Jack still on the job for the last couple of days. 

And the three of us were in Shalikashvili’s office about 11:00 in the morning on a Saturday morning, and he had just come back from a White House meeting. 

And he was all fired up in the way that Shali could be. And he said, "So," he said, "we will see who will be the real soldiers this weekend! There’s much work to be done! This operation on Haiti has to be completed! The planning must be done correctly, and it must be done this weekend! So we will see who are the real soldiers!"


Then the phone buzzed, and he got up from this little round table the four of us were sitting at to take the call from the White House. We started looking at each other. 

We said, "Gosh, I wonder where this came from." I mean, we were all getting ready to check out of the building in an hour or so. We had finished off the messages and paperwork. 

And we just usually got together because there was normally a crisis every Saturday anyway, and so we normally would come in for the Saturday morning crisis. 

And so, Shali came back, and so I said to him, I said, "Well, sir, we’ve been talking amongst ourselves, and we’re happy to work all weekend to get all this done, but this is just a drill, right, on Haiti?".

He looked at me, and he said, "Wes," he said, "this is no drill." He said, "I’m not authorized to tell you this. But," he said "the decision has been made, and the United States will invade Haiti. The date is the 20th" — I think it was this date — "of the 20th of September. And the planning must be done, and it must be done now. And if any of you have reservations about this, this is the time to leave." 

So I looked at Jack, and I looked at Walt. They looked at me. I mean, we kind of shrugged our shoulders and said, "OK, if you want to invade Haiti, I mean, it’s not illegal. It’s not the country we’d most like to invade. The opposition there consists of five armored vehicles. But sure, I mean, if the President says to do it, yeah, we’re not going resign over it."

And so, we didn’t resign. Nobody resigned.


But Shali was a very smart man. He knew. He knew he was bigger than his job, and he knew that you had to ask yourself the moral, legal and ethical questions first. And so, I’m encouraged by the fact that some of these generals have said this about Iran. They should be asking these questions first.


The Truth about the Middle East
The truth about the Middle East is that, had there been no oli there, it would be like Afrika.

There is nobody who threatens to interfere in Africa, the problem is just the opposite.


We keep asking for people to interfere and stop it.

And there are no questions that the presence of petroleum 
through out the region, has spark great power involvement, but there has always been this attitude, that we some how could interfere and use force in that region.

THE

US NAVY

SECRETLY DESIGNED

ANTI-GRAVITY AIRCRAFT

WHICH LOOKS LIKE AN

ALIEN UFO

By

Søren Nielsen

2019

The US Navy has been granted a patent for an advanced aircraft which resembles a flying saucer UFO.

Military inventors filed plans for a highly unusual flying machine which uses an "inertial mass reduction device" to travel at "extreme speeds". 

What that means is that the aircraft uses complex technology to reduce its mass and thereby lessen inertia (an object’s resistance to motion) so it can zoom along at high velocities.

The patent is highly complex and describes methods of reducing the mass of an aircraft using various techniques including the generation of gravity waves, which were first detected in 2016 after being produced when two black holes collided.

"It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime," the patent says. 

The craft described in the patent features a cavity wall filled with gas, which is then made to vibrate using powerful electromagnetic waves. 

This then creates a vacuum around the craft, allowing it to propel itself at high speeds. 

The UFO-style ship can be used in water, air or even space. "It is possible to envision a hybrid aerospace/undersea craft (HAUC), which due to the physical mechanisms enabled with the inertial mass reduction device, can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities," the patent continues.

"This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath." 

Although the US Navy applied for the patent in 2016 and it was granted last year, it doesn’t necessarily mean the craft has been built and tested. 

However, the technology is further evidence of the military’s interest in developing "exotic" technologies.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that US government researchers investigated wormholes, antigravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drives and high energy laser weapons during a probe into "unexplained aerial phenomena" called the Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AATIP). Details of AATIP were first released in 2017, including reports of a sighting made by fighter pilots from the USS Nimitz. 

These pilots saw a huge patch of churning, turbulent water the size of a Boeing 737, suggesting something was beneath the surface, as well as a "tic tac" aircraft which zoomed off at almost impossibly high speeds. 

We spoke to "Nick Pope", former UFO investigator at the Ministry of Defence, and asked if he saw any similarities between the patented design and the Nimitz Tic Tac. 

"A hybrid craft, capable of flying both in the air and underwater, is uncannily similar to what was reported in the USS Nimitz incident from 2004," he said.

"There was a similar incident of a UFO flying underwater in Puerto Rico in 2013. 

The possible connection between the USS Nimitz incident and this patent is intriguing, and it’s interesting that the US Navy seems to be the link here. 

"It’s possible that the patent is inspired by the incident and is part of an attempt to work out the technology behind the objects that were chased by the Navy F-18s. This is known as "reverse-engineering"."

He said a "key question" is how the plans fit in with the wider AATIP project. In the latest patent, author "Salvatore Cezar Pais" mentions "Harold Puthoff", a key figure in AATIP who commissioned the 38 papers exploring exotic technologies, which were then used by Defense Intelligence Agency durings briefings filed with the US Congress. 

"The papers that got media attention related to anti-gravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drive and wormholes, but a key point is that many of the papers relate to exotic propulsion systems – not just the technology that would enable us to build a faster aircraft, drone or missile, but the technology that we’d need for interstellar travel," Pope added. 

"These patents might be the first steps in taking humankind to the stars."

We asked if he believed the craft in the patent had ever been built. This patent for a "craft using an inertial mass reduction device" is fascinating, and is one of three patents filed by US Navy scientist "Salvatore Cezar Pais". 

"The other one of his patents that caught my eye was one for a "high-frequency gravitational wave generator". 

It’s sometimes hard to tell where the boundary lies between fringe science and science fiction. Furthermore, even if the theoretical physics turns out to be sound, aeronautical engineers still have to be able to build something, if any of this is to have any tangible effect. 

"If they have built the technology described in the patents, I’m sure the program is highly classified. The bottom line is that if any of this works, we’re in game-changing territory."

Military inventors filed plans for a highly unusual flying machine which uses an ‘inertial mass reduction device’ to travel at ‘extreme speeds’. What that means is that the aircraft uses complex technology to reduce its mass and thereby lessen inertia (an object’s resistance to motion) so it can zoom along at high velocities. The patent is highly complex and describes methods of reducing the mass of an aircraft using various techniques including the generation of gravity waves, which were first detected in 2016 after being produced when two black holes collided.

"It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime," the patent says. 

The craft described in the patent features a cavity wall filled with gas, which is then made to vibrate using powerful electromagnetic waves. 

This then creates a vacuum around the craft, allowing it to propel itself at high speeds. 

The UFO-style ship can be used in water, air or even space. 

"It is possible to envision a hybrid aerospace/undersea craft (HAUC), which due to the physical mechanisms enabled with the inertial mass reduction device, can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities," the patent continues.

"This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath." 

Although the US Navy applied for the patent in 2016 and it was granted last year, it doesn’t necessarily mean the craft has been built and tested.

• The US Navy applied for three patents in 2016. One of them was for a “craft using an inertial mass reduction device”, and it was granted last year. US Navy scientist Salvatore Cezar Pais filed the patent. The theoretical craft would use an "inertial mass reduction device" generating artificial gravity waves. With this reduction in mass, it thereby lessens the object’s resistance to motion, or "inertia", and is able to travel at a much greater velocity in water, air or even space.
• "It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local space-time," the patent states. "This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath."
• The craft described in the patent features a cavity wall filled with gas, which is then made to vibrate using powerful electromagnetic waves. This then creates a vacuum around the craft, allowing it to propel itself at high speeds.
• Earlier this year, it was revealed that US government researchers investigated wormholes, antigravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drives and high energy laser weapons during an official but covert probe into "unexplained aerial phenomena" called the Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AATIP). The program allegedly ended in 2012. Details of AATIP were first released in 2017.
•  Nick Pope, former UFO investigator at the Ministry of Defence, noted that this patented design was “uncannily similar” to the ‘tic tac UFO’ that was reported by Navy jet pilots from the USS Nimitz off of the coast of San Diego in 2004. The pilots saw a huge patch of churning, turbulent water suggesting something was beneath the surface, and then a tic tac UFO that accelerated at an ‘impossibly’ high speed. Pope also said that a similar incident of a UFO flying underwater occurred in Puerto Rico in 2013. “It’s possible that the patent is inspired by the incident and is part of an attempt to work out the technology behind the objects that were chased by the Navy F-18s. This is known as ‘reverse-engineering’,” says Pope.
• The Navy patent also mentions Dr. Harold Puthoff, a key figure in AATIP who commissioned the 38 papers exploring exotic propulsion system technologies, which were used in Defense Intelligence Agency briefings filed with the US Congress. This is the type of “technology that we’d need for interstellar travel,” Pope added. “These patents might be the first steps in taking humankind to the stars.”
• Another Navy patent was for a “high-frequency gravitational wave generator”. “If they have built the technology described in the patents, I’m sure the program is highly classified,” said Pope. “The bottom line is that if any of this works, we’re in game-changing territory.”
• Although the US Navy applied for the patent in 2016 and it was granted last year, it doesn’t necessarily mean the craft has been built and tested. However, the technology is further evidence of the military’s interest in developing ‘exotic’ technologies.